this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
98 points (97.1% liked)

Forgotten Weapons

1643 readers
1 users here now

This is a community dedicated to discussion around historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content. Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/

Rules:

1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. This is not the place to deride others for their race, sexuality, or etc. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.

2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissable, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy. Let's not make this a place where we battle over which color ties our politicians should have, or the issues of today.

3) No Advertising This rule doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements or showing more contemporary ads as a means of displaying information on an appropriate topic. The aim of this rule is to combat spam/irrelevant advertising campaigns.

4) Keep Post on Topic This rule will be enforced with leeway. Just keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons or closely adjacent content. If you feel you have something that's worth posting here that isn't about either of those (and doesn't violate other rules) feel free to reach out to a mod.

5) No NSFW Content Please refrain from posting uncensored extreme gore or sexualized content. If censored these posts may be fine.

Post Guide Lines

These are suggestions not rules.

-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]

-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.

-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".

-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.

Adjacent Communities

If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.

Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This one was made in Nuremberg by Hans Stopler, so I suppose raise a stein to German engineering. Once again it never fails to impress. Revolvers wouldn't become commercially successful & produced in mass quantities until the 1800s.

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/11/15/worlds-oldest-known-revolver/

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 months ago

One would not be wise to enter into a duel at the time with the one person that owned this.

[–] drailin@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So in my DND campaign setting, I had planned on black powder being a pretty recent discovery, called flashsand by the country who discovered it. One of my players wanted to be a gunslinger, so we worked out that he would have the first gun, built by his father who had to hide from the military to keep it out of the wrong hands. He wanted a revolver and to be a proto-desperado type, and I frankly didn't want to litigate logistics with a first-time player. I had been having a tough time squaring the circle between "first gun" and "revolver" but this is a perfect middleground!

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Glad to help! Technological adoption is never instant.

Today we've had jet packs, flying cars, and rocket pistols for years. In the case of the latter over a century even. But that doesn't mean every Tom, Dick, and Harry flys to work.

But if you've got the cash or know how maybe you can.

[–] CandyPants@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

As a guy who dabbles a lot in black powder guns..... My guess is that it was very rare to make it through a full cylinder without a malfunction

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it makes me think of a gatling gun. Something that had a good idea of where things could go, but the execution wasn't quite yet there and if you fired it for too long the barrels would melt, so it didn't have a large impact on warfare.

But it's interesting seeing the early ways people tried to improve the fire rate of guns.

Then Browning came along and made the gatling gun obsolete and improved on the revolver's semi-auto fire, too.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We take it for granted now but the idea of using the recoil or gas pressure from a cartridge to cycle a gun is genius.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Horribly brilliant.

Though to be fair, it wasn't Browning's fault military commanders didn't realize they needed an entire new set of tactics and strategies to do war while machine guns exist. Though WWII wasn't much better than WWI for total deaths since machine guns are always meat grinders, even if your officers aren't trying to feed them with calvary charges. They'd been using machine guns in Africa for a while yet still thought that horses would play an important role on the battlefield rather than moving them all to logistics, and millions paid with their lives for it.

There are a bunch of modern weapons that are pure genius that humanity has suffered because of. Artillery, bomber planes, and nukes are other examples. It's actually kinda ironic: nukes are the only weapon that increased offensive capabilities drastically while actually accomplishing the goal of reducing deaths from people willing to go to war. At least so far; it would only take one bad day to change that entirely.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

In a dark irony a couple times that people have invented faster shooting guns they've imagined that we'd field less soldiers in war. Leading to less deaths.

On your nuke comparison I see an interesting parallel to the Giradoni posted today. It enabled Lewis and Clark to cross America without major bloodshed. But an inequality in capacity to destroy isn't all ways something harnessed with virtue.

[–] marretics@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Forgive my ignorance, but where would the original owner have bought bullets for this?

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The bullets would have been round lead balls. You could cast them yourself fairly easily. I would imagine the person who owned this would have been rich enough to have their own personal armorer to cast bullets for them.

Here's a mold:

Then to load it you would follow the same procedures you would follow to load a normal flintlock pistol.