this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
958 points (98.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27027 readers
671 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that's an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.

I'll go first: I think "Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows" was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtraOrdinary@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1998), starring Johnny Depp sitting at a blasphemous 50%

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BowserBasher@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Gonna go with Mortal Kombat (1995) 45%, a video game to film adaptation of a fighting game is never going to be deep, but this is a fun ride. Could add in the follow up, Annihilation (1997), 4% and the 2021 film which sits at 54% too. Don’t expect much and they are fun films.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] _jonatan_@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Con Air" is a classic. I found "brightburn" very enjoyable. I rewatch "the faculty" every now and then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wren@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Sucker Punch (2011) (technically not made in my 'adult' life, since I was still a teenager, but semantics)

I genuinely love this movie and don't understand how it's rated so poorly. Sure it's got that Zack Snyder-flair (but I think it actually works for this??) and it can seem a little gratuitous. but even then to me it seems like it's done to make a point instead of just 'hehehe hot girls in short skirts'. The action is awesome, the sets are cool af, the soundtrack is phenomenal, the cast is great, the plot is interesting, (and sure, maybe me being a mega gay means I'm giving this a higher rating then I otherwise might have) - it's just overall a great movie to me. I do wonder how much of the ratings is a symptom that all women lead films suffer from review bombs by some upsetti-spaghetti men, but even I think this movie is not generally liked by most.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mv777711@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember really enjoying the Van Helsing movie with Hugh Jackman as a kid. The world and weapons were really cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Boondock Saints (Nov 99 is close enough). It's such a fun movie, but only has a 27%

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ech@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Jingle All the Way (the original, not the abomination with Larry the cable guy). 19% RT.

I think most people think it's too "weird", but I genuinely love it. It's got all the great 90s tropes, a cartoony core in a live action movie, an anti-consumerism message in a Christmas movie, and Phil Hartman. What's not to love?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey

STATION!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] soulifix@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Matrix Revolutions.

Released in the same year as Reloaded, which I don't think a movie series of that caliber has been done in a long time or since. But we got two Matrix sequels in one year. Reloaded has gotten a little more accepted as time went on but people are still divided on Revolutions. I quite frankly, thought the mainline series couldn't have ended on more of a note than it did. A lot of the content has gone over everyone's heads, even at the time, because it was all techy-techy stuff and had biblical themes in it as well. But if you look at the entire Matrix series as you would TRON, it makes a little more sense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] makatwork@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrKurteous@feddit.nu 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Speed Racer (2008)! The Wachowski sisters directed it after the Matrix trilogy, and the silly and over-the-top aesthetics seem to have put of many, but I think it's a genuinely fun movie with great themes and some awesome emotional moments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Every person who likes horror movies can probably name a few examples. Horror movies are somehow really weirdly understood by a lot of people, including critics. Or perhaps I watch them for the wrong reasons, I don't know.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (9 children)

"Judge Dredd" (1995)

It's fun, funny, entertaining, and while not well written, is well acted.

Honorable mention is "Demolition Man" (1993) for similar reasons. Though it's in the 60s when it comes to a rating.

It's like, sometimes I want to sit back turn my brain off for 2 hours, and just enjoy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I unironically enjoy both the 2005 and 2007 Fantastic Four movies. Were they cheesy as hell? Yep, but damn sure the source material is just as cheesy sometimes. Could the MCU do them better now? Almost certainly. Still fun movies, except for making Galactus the Glow Cloud (all hail). They fucked up a lot of Doom's backstory, but I like Julian McMahon (even if this also wasn't the best role for him).

Also, Chris Evans exiting the shower. Damn.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Krisha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Speed Racer has a 42% critic rating which i would consider a crime against culture. one of my favourite movies

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CustodialTeapot@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Final Fantasy: the spirits within.

The animation felt way ahead of its time. It's been over a decade since I watched it, but I have very fond and exciting memories of watching it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] generalsockpuppet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OhFudgeBars@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Dude, Where's My Car, 17%/47%. I haven't seen it since it was in the theatre, but I remember thinking it was a good disengage-your-brain comedy that got some chuckles and had a plot that was weird enough to be a joke on it's own. What were people expecting, with a title like that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WhiteTiger@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

George of the Jungle (43%) is still just as fun as it was when I was a kid.

Tookie-tookie!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I just watched Cowboys & Aliens (2011) for the first time earlier today and really enjoyed it.

Lots of famous faces in front of the camera and lots of well known names involved behind the scenes.

Producers include Steven Spielberg, Jon Favreau, & Ron Howard.

Actors include Harrison Ford, Daniel Craig, & Olivia Wilde.

Seems like a really stupid idea for a plot but I found myself about halfway through thinking "this isn't really that different from a Star Wars type movie... That's basically already alien cowboys .."

Oh yeah... Forgot to mention that Steve Oedekirk (from Kung Pow fame) was also involved .. he was one of three writers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Amadan@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Jumper is on 15% critics and 44%. Definitely a dumb movie that could've been much better but I thought it was a cool scifi movie. Plus I've always liked teleportation powers and powers in general being used for something other than being a superhero.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chifilly@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sucker Punch. Rated 47% audience score and 22% critic score, but I love it. The story and concept are great, and the action scenes are fun

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wjrii@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Jupiter Ascending was a bit of a mess, but overall I liked it. I would contrast with Valerian, which is also a mess, and which I came close to liking, but in the end I just couldn't sell myself on it. The rest of the movie channels its influences and feels like 5th Element meets Star Wars, but DeHaan and Delavigne spend the whole movie acting like they're in a high school production of Blade Runner.

EDIT TO ADD MY OTHER COMMENT: Conversely, for all the bee gloop and DNA dynasty and flying rollerblades and other extremely weird shit that was sort of half-assedly put together in Jupiter Ascending, Tatum and Kunis had me more invested.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bicentennial Man (1999) starring Robin Williams. It's one of my favorites.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bulwark@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Alien vs Predator. It got horrible reviews but it has everything I like in it.

[–] Piers@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows

AFAIK the intention was to build a franchise and now Robert Downey Jr has finished with Marvel they're all keen to pick it back up again (he's also pushing for Jonny Depp to join the franchise.)

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

National Treasure is 46% and it's sequel is 36% for critics. Audiences like both more and if a third film in the trilogy is ever made I'm in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Street Fighter has 11%.

It's glorious. It's a comedy that only Raul Julia is in on. Everyone else playing it dead serious, but a super hammy scenery chewing villain, with some genuinely great lines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDRnVPlRzag

It's what modern movies are missing. Especially the recent MCU fare. Jonathan Majors and Josh Brolin may well be great actors, but they're not great villains. They're a better fit for mumbling their way through a 3 hour Chris Nolan epic.

Think Tim Curry or Alan Rickman in practically anything they were ever in. The earlier movies had this spark with Jeff Bridges and Tom Hiddleston, but they've lost it now. These things live and die by their choice of villain. They are after all the reason for the movie to exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oxidising@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago
[–] SkepticalRobot@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Josie and the Pussycats.

It was so far ahead of its time that critics just didn't get it because the world they were satirizing was still about a decade away. (Instagram, fame, product placement, fanboyism...)

Also, bonus answer. The Big Hit. Because fuck it. Lou Diamond Phillips knew exactly what kind of shclock movie he was in and chewed the scenery fantastically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Suicide Squad.

Ok since no movie critic of comic book movies actually reads comics or ever bothered to read the Wikipedia articles summarizing I present to you their issues and why they are wrong. Also including is generic movie information..

The prison has people with no powers! Yes, exactly like the comic books. It was the most dangerous not the most powerful. Harley is dangerous because of nothing else her connection to the Joker. Deadshot is dangerous because people want to hire him. Angry powerful people.

The movie had modern music in it! Movies tend to do this. Be not alarmed.

The pacing was off in the middle! Agreed but the same can be said about everything Kubrick made and I don't hear you complaining.

Harley and Joker have a toxic relationship! Yes, they are villains.

There wasn't enough time spent on character backstory! Use your glowing rectangle.

They caused the problem they were supposed to be solving! Yes, like the comics. It was a metaphor for the CIA. Fidel Castro, Iraq, that dictator in Panama, the Taliban....Got it?

Harley should have better weapons! Have someone scream at you and run at you waving a baseball bat and tell me that you are okay with the situation.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] neeeeDanke@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cksyder@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Core.

It tries so hard, and I just love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never visit the site to see what other people an critics think of a movie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] johnthebeboptist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I was honestly a little shocked to find The Fountain rated so low, Tomatometer (fuck the tomatometer anyway, audience score is where it's usually at) was 52% with scathing reviews, the audience score fortunately remedied the situation with 74% cause I was seriously starting to look for another site.

And for it's opposite: The Blair Witch Project is 86% vs 56%. I haven't seen it in ages, have been planning to, but it was one of my favorite movies for a while.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Jeaper@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now its probably not a hill Im willing to die on, but:

The Mummy (2017)
15% Tomatometer, 35% Audience score

I just had a good time, what can I say

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thelastknowngod@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Mars Attacks

Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets - The opening sequence is pretty amazing actually.

Sex Drive (esp the directors cut)

This is harder than I thought it would be. I was also surprised at the ratings for Mars Attacks and Sex Drive. Mars Attacks is a legit great movie but admittedly very odd. Sex Drive is just stupid fun.. Kinda peak teen sex comedy. Not perfect but funny in it's own way.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hudson Hawk

Also 1991. Definitly the so bad its good category. A preexisting parody to the DaVinci code. 31Critics/56Aud

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›