this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
285 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 143 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Didn't we try the whole Dems helping Republicans thing before? And didn't that get us into this whole-ass mess to begin with, Hillary?

[–] RalphFurley@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago (20 children)

I'm sure Biden won't ignore WI, MI, PA this time around like Hillary did.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] jackalope@lemmy.ml 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Haley isn't going to win but voting for her in the primaries will help fracture the republican party further.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If she wins the primaries, there's no way Trump won't run as an independent.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

And that will split GOP votes.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Not unless she buys him off with promises of pardons and funding for his lawsuits. They could very well strike a deal where she names him as her VP and promises him oversight of the Department of Justice.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Or it won't. It will look like they are more popular and bolster the outlook for the party.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Why the fuck are liberals still doing this shit? Was getting trump elected not enough of a sign that it's stupid and doesn't work??

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 43 points 9 months ago

It's like they forgot Hillary Clinton literally propped up Trump because she thought he'd never win.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 53 points 9 months ago

Stop playing fucking metagames and learn how to govern.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 34 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Braindead strategy. How about galvanizing voters with popular leadership decisions which have a positive effect on people’s lives?! Did you think to try that you dumb fucks?

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How to lose an election and radicalize voters: a memoir of America by the DNC

[–] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Chapter 1: How to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory - the 2016 Elections

[–] butt_mountain_69420@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The Democratic National Committee is controlled opposition. Obama was a fantastic president by Republican standards, Hillary, while more qualified than any candidate has ever been, has the charisma of a dumpster cheeseburger (iT wUz HEr TurN), Joe is a Nixon-era neocon goofus. They don't want to win, but if they happen to accidently win, they make sure it's someone safe and slightly right-of-center.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doesnt_use_lemmy@lemmings.world 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Isn't this how we got trump in the first place?

[–] sleepmode@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Hilary thought he was easy work. Blew up in her face.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website 27 points 9 months ago
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 16 points 9 months ago (5 children)

That would be the most Dem thing Dems have ever done. Play games and get Haley elected when Biden would have just cruised over trump.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't suspect Biden will just cruise over Trump. Look at the polls, Trump leads in swing states. I hope Biden can win, but it won't be easy.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Don't mention polling. Centrists hate it because it indicates that their constant shift rightward has become unpopular.

[–] Alto@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actual results since roe was overturned have been ~+9 towards dem/dem supported policies than polling has said. I still have hope.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aew360@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Haley isn’t getting elected. She has virtually no path towards the GOP nomination. If she did, MAGATs aren’t going to vote for her unless he was on the ballot, and then if she did put him on the ballot, she’ll lose the moderate votes.

Trump has a chance to cause chaos by losing another general election. He could also do even more damage by winning another general election. Haley, if she somehow won the primary and general, would be so much less destructive.

So yeah, voting for Haley in the primary is the fucking move and it’s why I didn’t vote for Biden in the SC primary.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Nikki Haley's Sudden Wealth Rooted in Weapons Industry, Pro-War Advocacy Network.

The former U.N. ambassador went from virtually no savings in 2017 to a small fortune in part from defense contracting and war advocacy ties.

https://www.leefang.com/p/nikki-haleys-sudden-wealth-rooted

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Look, no Democrat is saying she'd be great or even close to being better than Biden.

But she'd certainly be better than Trump. And if she can split the Republican votes in the general election, even better.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aew360@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don’t care if she sucks. She won’t beat Trump in the end. The longer she stays in the race, the more angry he’s gonna get at his own party

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

She wins the primary if SCOTUS rules that Trump is an insurrectionist, and she polls well against Biden precisely because she appeals to "enlightened centrists."

The question is not whether Trump should be barred as insurrectionist. The question is what candidate the leash holders of certain Justices want.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] books@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I think she'd win in a head to head against Biden. Unless trump, which he would, sabotages her at every chance they get.

I can pretty much guarantee that bidens folks want to run against the guy who keeps losing vs a young competent woman.

Don't confuse my thoughts with support. I don't like her, I'm just realistic.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 11 points 9 months ago (5 children)

After living through the last few elections, I'm not going to bet on whether Biden vs Haley or Biden vs Trump will lead to a better result. But I really don't see how helping Haley would actually accomplish anything. Even if the Democrats made a big (wasted) effort to push & campaign for Haley, it's not going to be nearly enough to make her the nominee.

Absent the Supreme Court declaring Trump ineligible (don't hold your breath) It's going to be Biden vs Trump. Prepare for that. Messing with the Republican's sham primary is a waste of effort and a distraction from more constructive things Democrats could be doing like getting their voters registered and ready to go to the polls in November.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kethal@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

This is not "messing with Trump". Anyone in any party should participate in primaries. They decide who everyone else will get to vote for, and in some regards they are more important than the general election. For example, if someone is in a gerrymandered district, primaries are the only elections that matter for district level races.

If one party literally has only a single candidate, and thus there is no choice, don't vote in that primary. It's pointless. Vote in the other primary, for whatever candidate you like best, even if you don't like the candidate. Then there's some hope that when the general election comes, you'll at least be OK with both candidates. In the general election, vote for the one you like best, and if the candidate you like loses that election, you made a difference in the primary. Republican, Democrat, any party or no party, it's the way to give your vote the most influence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right wingers support right wingers. Who knew?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

We need to help Donald Trump as a way to sow chaos in the Republican Party and guarantee ourselves a resounding victory in 2016.

---Hillary Clinton

Jesus fucking christ dems have you considered running a candidate that people want to vote for because he'll make their lives better, or did Bill Clinton convince you that you can just run as Gay Reagan every election and then either you win or your stock portfolio does?

load more comments
view more: next ›