this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2024
628 points (93.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26963 readers
3281 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I am a middle aged white guy and I honestly don't give a shit about the Beatles lol

They have maybe 4 or 5 songs I actually like and I've always said they were overrated

[–] incogtino@lemmy.zip 57 points 7 months ago (2 children)

That's because the Beatles broke up in 1970, so anyone who remembers them from their active years is well over 60, which would be really stretching the definition of middle-aged

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm 42 and I grew up surrounded by people my own age who were Beatles fanatics lol people actually kept listening to them long after they broke up

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

38 here. I absolutely love the Beatles. I didn’t like their earlier stuff when I was younger but I’ve worked my way backwards from Help as I’ve got older.

I love all of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How about beetles? Wanna discuss beetles?

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, I'm still pissed they made bumblebee a Camaro.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think my favorite Beatles fact is they were being taxed at like a 90+% rate and didn't even know for a couple years.

When they found out and took it to court the judge basically said "you were making so much money you didn't even realize you were being taxed at all. Sucks to suck we're gonna keep taxing you at the same rate"

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

Based Judge is based

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 48 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Am I the only on here that actually likes the Beatles? They're catchy and familiar, not to mention have some weird and whacky unusual stuff like Revolution 9. Also found the conspiracy theory fun to dive into.

Obviously music is extremely subjective but you can't tell me that their music was not objectively a massive deal, at least historically.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I also love that their music was essentially mostly all written, composed, produced, and edited by the 4 of them. Nowadays I'm told about how _____ is such a great musician, then I look at the album credits and there's like 20 song writers, 50 producers, 100+ sound mixers, crew, editors, etc. So like are those people that good if they need 200+ people behind them making it listenable?

I guess what I'm saying is that new music is over produced, and I appreciate the simplicity of older music like the Beatles

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I love the Beatles. I guess I am a middle aged white guy now, but they’ve been my favorite band since I was a kid.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

There's nothing wrong with their music. It's not what I listen to, but I don't dislike them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Hating any music is weird, as hate takes vastly more effort than indifference.

Hating specifically anything of comparable acclaim as the Beatles is, frankly, just contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism.

If you didn't like them you just wouldn't like them, but what you actually like is not liking them as a factor of your personality.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

It's possible to hate something without being active about it. Saying "I hate lima beans" doesn't necessarily mean you're going on a hate campaign against lima beans, it just means you have a strong distaste for them. It's a valid feeling regardless of how many others love lima beans. In fact, lots of other people loving something and talking about it nonstop and calling it the best thing ever will obviously mean someone who hates that thing will get annoyed hearing about something they hate, so it's fine to express that distaste.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Trivia (from Wikipedia): "Taxman" from their 1966 album Revolver was the group's first topical song and the first political statement they had made in their music.

"Taxman" was influential in the development of British psychedelia and mod-style pop, and has been recognised as a precursor to punk rock. When performing "Taxman" on tour in the early 1990s, Harrison adapted the lyrics to reference contemporaneous leaders, citing its enduring quality beyond the 1960s. The song's impact has extended to the tax industry and into political discourse on taxation.

Unlike their other political songs, which are fairly vague peace&love jobs, this one tackles a concrete issue: It protests the 95% top marginal tax rate.


You've heard how "the boomers" screwed up everything for later generations. Here's exhibit A from pop culture. Don't just think about evil, old men in smoky backrooms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I used to work with a lot of young people and some of them told me they hated the Beatles. So I would randomly play Beatles songs and occasionally ask them what they thought. Turns out they never even listened to the Beatles except for maybe a couple of pop/radio songs. It was just a fad to hate on them

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

That is not surprising to me in the slightest. Honestly I just posted this because I knew it would lead to a discussion I'd love to read. People have such strong feelings on music.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Hate is a strong word. I just prefer to listen to other stuff. I understand how they were culturally significant half a century ago, but that’s half a century ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don't hate them. I just don't listen to their music. It's not my taste. I do appreciate their significance and popularity, though. I just don't really enjoy their music.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago (8 children)

middle aged? lmao the average baked in Beatles fan is Ike 80 now.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 7 months ago

I haven't really listened to their music, but I recognise its significance to recent history.

[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Middle-age would be in your 40s-50s. Not to diss my dead relatives too hard, but you're thinking of old fucks that would have any solid opinion on that. In a handful of years, the music middle aged men will be up in arms about is *NSYNC.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I actually wasn't thinking about it at all. I was thinking about bugs!

[–] summerof69@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why hate them? What did they do to you?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 months ago (7 children)

The Beatles were popular 50-60 years ago.

Even if they listened to it when they were 10, they are about to retire in a couple of years.

Nothing middle aged about it.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

The Beatles have been one of the most popular bands in the world consistently every year from the 60s right up until today lol how do so many people think everyone immediately stops listening to any band the second they break up lol

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Why do you think someone would go to the trouble of drilling 2 extra holes in each of these containers?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (12 children)

The same boomers when you say bands playing at 400bpm are expressing emotions and working harder than the guy bending to the blues note slowly for the millionth time.

It's got no soul! How can you refine yourself through hours of practice and technique and dedication and also express yourself at the same time???

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (20 children)

They're severely overrated, but also quite culturally/historically relevant. So... what can ya do?

[–] rainynight65@feddit.de 36 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They are extremely relevant, culturally and historically. They broke new grounds for music, and a lot of today's music would simply not exist without the Beatles, or some of their contemporaries. That alone means they're not overrated.

However that doesn't mean everyone has to love them. It's possible to recognise their relevance without worshipping them.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 7 months ago

I mean honestly, wtf do I know. Most people would hate a good portion of my music library. This is all subjective.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think this is a case of the Seinfeld effect where people take them for granted due to them being so influential that part of their sound has become imbued into every single pop band that came after them.

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 14 points 7 months ago

Yeah, there are any number of "But so-and-so did it so much better than the Beatles!" instances, but the thing is that so-and-so wouldn't have even tried if the Beatles hadn't done it first.

Take or leave their music, there's no denying the massive influence they had.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not proposing we do anything. I think they deserve their fame.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We could send Japanese women to individually destroy their careers.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a bunch of work tho

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 7 months ago

They're all trained saboteurs, they need little to no guidance. Get this... we use performance artists. Success is guaranteed!

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I like The Beatles, I do not like John Lennon

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Hate the Beatles all you want. You just can’t hate the Stones.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The stones still do shows. The Beatles do not.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'll bet there are more stones than species of beetle

[–] yemmly@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Types of stone or instances of stone?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

If you really want to scandalize them, say this: The Kinks are better than The Beatles

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Those cans aren't all white and neither are we - get your ears checked weirdo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›