this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
134 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5295 readers
689 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 50 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Obligatory reminder to watch Technology Connections on the correct sizing and backups - the initial quote might be 2x or 3x what you need.

[–] digdug@kbin.social 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

Is there an even longer version? Technology Connections is like LOTR - an extra few hours is always welcome.

[–] kvt57tgn@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you have a link? I can’t seem to find it.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Someone else linked the main video, here is the playlist.

Basics:

  • It's just an air conditioner with an extra valve to reverse the flow.
  • They work in much colder weather than you are imagining.
  • They are more efficient than you are imagining.
  • They are even better if you look for the latest models coming out of the far east.
  • Actually do the calculations for how much power you need - don't just let the installers say "This house currently has x kW of heating, therefore it will need an x kW heat pump" (same for the air conditioning mode)
  • It's probably better to have a resistive heat backup for occasional extreme-cold days than to have an oversized heat pump.
[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, the biggest problem is mentality, I find. People expect to walk into a freezing cold house, thonk the BOOST button and have bouncing radiators in fifteen minutes. Heat Pumps ideally need to be left to their thermostats to maintain the temperature.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

How is this even a question? Heat pumps have been standard in new homes for at least 40 years now.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't know what municipality/region/state/country you're from, but that's not the case here

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The article is about NYC where buildings are all much older than 50 years. But for the rest of the country? Everyone has known that heat pumps are more efficient for decades which is why they are standard for all new installs. Unless you live in northern Canada, they save money which is why everyone chooses them. Of course there is backup heat for extreme cold which is why it's always hybrid heatpump with electric or glass backup.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Smart thermostats are what make them really good. In climates where it gets really cold, you need to have a way to switch over from pumping cold air to pumping hot air to using a secondary heat source.

It wouldn't have to be that smart, or even networked. A z80 or 8008 processor would have been plenty. High end systems could have done it in the 70s, with costs coming down quickly through the 80s.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In climates where it gets really cold, you need to have a way to switch over from pumping cold air to pumping hot air to using a secondary heat source.

That's standard for all whole house heat pumps and has been for forever. ( as opposed to the mini split heatpumps where it's a heatpump for one room in a house).

[–] BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Not in all US states and not in all countries. And some climate deniers are even fear-mongering people against heat pumps.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They haven't been standard in colder parts of the US — people use natural gas, propane, or fuel oil depending on where in the country.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I can believe that because many people choose the absolute cheapest solution rather than looking at the 5-10 year cost of ownership.

Technology connections YouTuber is in Chicago and chose a heat pump because it's cheaper. I have a relative in Minnesota and they are on a ground sourced heatpump because it's so much cheaper long term.

There's not much population in the US further north than the middle of Minnesota.

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Last time I looked in to it I'd still need a supplemental heater for when it's too cold for the heat pump to be effective (there were a handful of weeks just this/last year where we would be in trouble) in Chicago.

Ground source makes a lot more sense for new construction where you're already digging.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Backup heat is standard with all whole house heat pumps. You pick electric or gas based on cost.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago

Also doesn’t help that a lot of houses in the US are just really old and still have their original fossil fuel based heating.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The main reason I'd be hesitant to get one is because I don't really ever set my thermostat to heat. Even during the once-in-a-lifetime freeze a few years ago, we never ran any heaters (granted, we live in an apartment, so only like 2.5 walls are exposed to the outside - would be very different in an actual house, but I'd still rather opt for better insulation, a single space heater, and a heated blanket over spending that same money on a heat pump that does nothing for years at a time).

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If you live in an apartment, it's not your choice but the owner's? And a heatpump is an air conditioner in the summer. They cost about the same so why not have the option to heat too?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago
[–] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd love to, can someone convince my landlord?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Talk to them about how the high price of heating is making it tough for people to pay rent.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“I’ll just find someone who can afford it”

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago

Seriously though — if they move you to heat pumps, it can make it cheaper, which means that they end up collecting rent instead of the propane company or oil company.

[–] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have a few people I know that installed heat pumps about 10 or 12 years ago, and they have failed at this point. The cost to repair is more than a new heat pump and they are just getting a standard Ac unit and using the backup gas furnace that has minimal hours on it as the main heat source now.

I feel like this is more inherent obsolescence of the companies making parts and not so much the tech itself?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's definitely possible to buy low-quality appliances and end up with something which fails sooner than you'd want. That's true of every appliance out there.

There's a reason there are Consumer Reports reliability ratings for heat pumps — like they have for every other major appliance.

[–] svieg@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I agree that it might be a problem of lower-quality appliances. Anecdotally, mine is 20 years old and was repaired recently (some parts had to be manufactured as they don't make them anymore) and still works.

Is there an open alternative for Consumer Reports? The content of this link is blocked without a subscription it seems like. Thx!

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 months ago

There are other similar publications like the New York Times Wirecutter, but they're not generally available without a subscription.

I recommend paying a visit to your local library if you're thinking of buying a major appliance; in the US at least, libraries tend to have all the relevant subscriptions and can get you access.