this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
287 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The report said 59 per cent of retirees report helping their non-student adult children with both day-to-day expenses and big-ticket items like home purchases.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 91 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My father makes more retired than I do working full time.

[–] stev3yd@sh.itjust.works 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is straight up depressing

[–] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 33 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Op should have tried harder to be born earlier in time.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

Pull your time machine up by your bootstraps you lazy millennials. /s

[–] AnotherDirtyAnglo@lemmy.ca 35 points 6 months ago

Heh. After Dad died, my Mom shacked up with a guy we met while Dad was in the hospital. He went to the same high school as me, the same year I did. He's lazy, broke, bipolar and unmedicated by choice - and a rabid far-right conspiracy theorist... So technically, she's supporting an adult child.

I'm doing just fine, thanks. :D

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It says this includes things like helping with grandkids schooling.

My parents started a university savings account for my kids the day they were born because they wanted to, I hardly consider it "supporting" me and my wife in any way. The kids won't need it for a decade still, and we could cover their costs without it just fine.

Helpful, sure, but the headline is misleading at best if it's including that in the 60%.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I cannot fathom why you wouldn't consider that support. It is by definition. I think the problem is you consider support a negative for some reason. You're supposed to support your family there's nothing wrong with it.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The first paragraph of the article states:

The majority of Canadian retirees are supporting their adult children financially, which they say is having a negative impact on their own finances, a new report has found.

My parents have no negative impact on their finances, they can still afford to travel internationally 2-3 times a year for multiple weeks at a time, and yet they would be included in that percentage.

This makes the headline very misleading, since it implies that 60% of retirees are experiencing a negative impact upon their finances.

Instead, I'd like to see the percentage of retirees who think they are experiencing a negative impact upon their finances. That number would be more useful in determining what to do about the situation.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't see what that has to do with anything in either of our comments.

I'm also still not seeing why you immediately assume negative connotations.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I immediately assume negative connotations because the first sentence states "Negative Impact"

I don't know what part of that logic is confusing to you.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Socialism exists

Gen X: Perhaps I treated you too harshly

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's somebody saying that to Gen X right?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m saying that Gen X is realizing it wasn’t as evil as they were taught

Boomers are too far gone

Millennials already are commies

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I don't think Gen X ever let anyone convince them they're evil πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

And they are minimally obligated to do so considering they've hoarded such a gigantic portion of the economy

[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is funny because in something like 30 years, it will be children that will provide financially to their 80-90yo parents

[–] northmaple1984@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

My wife and I are providing for my MIL (aka she is living with us and not working) and she has barely cracked 60.

She does provide some childcare for us, but man is she lazy as shit while doing so... Just throws on TV and screws around on her phone. Somehow my wife can't even work full time despite the fact that her mother is home almost all the time, that's how bad it is.

[–] geography082@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Exactly the same happens in several countries . It’s a global crisis