1
1

Hi,

I'd like to have your feedback on a project idea.

I want to build a fast and efficient trustless bridge protocol based on atomic swaps, offering a user experience similar to that of popular custodial bridges.

Unlike P2P DEXs such as BasicSwap, Bisq, and Haveno, users would trade against automated market makers. It would be an automated open-source program that anyone could self-host, which would automatically accept users' swap requests for preconfigured pairs, in exchange for a small fee paid to the node operator.

The protocol would automatically aggregate liquidity from multiple market makers to fulfill large swaps, ensuring that liquidity isn't fragmented even if it's not deposited in a common pool.

The protocol would use adaptor signatures based atomic swaps when possible, for greater privacy and efficiency compared to HTLCs. I plan to initially support EVM chains (both native and ERC20), BTC and XMR.

The UI would be a simple web-based app, using RPC providers and light clients for blockchain interaction.

Unlike side-chain based bridges like THORChain, this architecture would not require the users or market makers to trust a separate validator set. Additionally, market makers would not be required to lock up all of their funds in smart contracts until they're participating in a swap. In fact, they could even provide Just-in-Time liquidity and, the rest of the time, leave their funds deposited on another DeFi protocol such as AAVE, withdrawing only to fulfill a swap.

I hope this design could attract users and liquidity providers looking for a simpler and faster protocol than existing P2P DEXs, but with greater security than today's leading bridges.

What do you think about it?

Could it reach a high level of adoption?

Would you use it to bridge, or provide liquidity yourself to this protocol?

2
1

Bitcoin saw heavy selling pressure after losing momentum near the highs. Price is now consolidating around the recent lows as buyers attempt to defend the current zone.

Key Levels:

Major Resistance: 63800

Major Support: 62500

My View:

BTC remains under short term bearish pressure while trading below the 63590 resistance zone. A breakout above this area may signal recovery attempts, while rejection could bring sellers back for another downside move.

I share multiple crypto and market setups, hourly analysis, updates and free trials for traders interested in following along.

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GjkbJFo1Egr7iHdBaqkyF5

3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
1
submitted 4 months ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/cryptocurrency@lemmy.world
10
1
11
1
12
1
Bisq Exchange is sublime (programming.dev)

I was floored by how intimate it feels to buy bitcoin on this platform.

If you have not already used Bisq and you ever need a quick $500 (or less) in BTC i 10/10 recommend. (if you do not have any bitcoin start with Bisq2 the fees are way higher but once you get a little BTC you can use it as deposit to start buying on Bisq).

anyways, thats just my 2 cents Have a most peaceful day!

13
1
14
1
USDT Nightmare (lemmy.nz)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by haroldmason@lemmy.world to c/cryptocurrency@lemmy.world

Custom USDT tokens are now being hawked through some Telegram accounts, such as this one https://t.me/blockzenn. Originally created for legitimate testing, they are increasingly being misused on cryptocurrency platforms and exchanges and are being swapped for fiat currency. These tokens appear fully legitimate on the blockchain and can be obtained cheaply, posing a critical security concern within the crypto ecosystem. Below is a screenshot of the custom USDT I purchased for a few USD.

15
1
16
1
17
1
Here we go!!! (lemmy.nz)

The thrills of crypto never stop. Where will we land?

18
1
19
1
20
1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Sunflier@lemmy.world to c/cryptocurrency@lemmy.world

So, I'm looking to upgrade some old at-home miners, and i saw this flu miner that just came out. It is marketed as highly efficient.

https://fluminer.com/en/product_detail.aspx?cid=390&id=50

It's almost 3 grand for 6 GH/s, but it eats 1700w of power. I have a an avalon q, which eats 1800+ watts at high power and gets 90 TH/s. Isn't that better? I thought it went from kilo -> mega -> giga -> tera. So, what am I missing here? How is the flu more efficient?

The fluminer is marketed as efficient, but if I am getting an order of magnitude less hashes for only 100 w savings, that doesn't seem efficient. I see that it uses the Scrypt algorithm, but does that really make that much of a difference than the SHA-256?

I pool mine with the unmineable pool, so it would seem more hashes = more coin.

21
1
22
1
23
1
24
1

A Manhattan jury convicted Tornado Cash co-founder Roman Storm on Wednesday of conspiring to operate an unlicensed money-transfer business, though jurors deadlocked on charges of money laundering conspiracy and sanctions violations after three days of deliberation.

Federal prosecutors alleged Storm helped cybercriminals launder more than $1 billion through the cryptocurrency mixing platform, which launched in 2019 as a decentralized protocol designed to obscure transaction origins by pooling and redistributing funds through smart contracts.

Abstract credit: https://slashdot.org/story/445258

25
1
view more: next ›

CryptoCurrency

466 readers
17 users here now

Welcome

Welcome to /c/CryptoCurrency on Lemmy.World, a sister community to the r/CryptoCurrency subreddit. Use it for open discussions on all subjects related to emerging crypto-currencies or crypto-assets.

Please bare with us as c/CC is a work in progress. Certain aspects will look out of place since Lemmy currently lacks certain features(wiki pages, mod tools, etc) and is not a one for one Reddit replacement. Therefore, ignore any rules below related to karma or Moons.

Rules

  1. Core Principles
  2. Spam
    • Rule #2.10 - Posting referral, promo links, or codes of any kind is strictly prohibited and will be met with a long-term or permanent ban. This includes "PM for referral", asking for referral codes or links, and linking to sites used solely for referral links.
    • See our Expanded Rules page for more details about this rule.
  3. Manipulation
  4. Giveaways or Illegal Activity
  5. Content Standards
  6. Personal Information
  7. Content Theft
  8. On Topic Discussion
  9. Suitable Titles and Flairs
  10. Communicate With The Mod Team

Resources and Tools

Education

Exchanges

Local Exchanges

Mining

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS