1376
73
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1377
35
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by artiman@piefed.social to c/privacy@programming.dev

I forked It from delightful-libre-hosters because it got discontinued

1378
50
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1379
65

Germany, Luxembourg, and Slovakia OPPOSED

All three countries rejects breaking encryption and are opposed to Chat Control as currently proposed. This is a critical step, securing the blocking minority required to stop this illegal mass surveillance for now (sources for Germany, Luxembourg, and Slovakia). [...]

1380
38
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy to c/privacy@programming.dev

A California bill to check kids’ ages online is heading to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s desk, after it secured rare support from major tech giants, including Google, Meta and Snap.

The proposal, which would require device makers and app stores to verify user ages, cleared the state Assembly 58-0 in the early hours of Saturday with backing from Republicans and Democrats.

Google and Meta, plus other tech firms like OpenAI and Pinterest, rallied around the online age verification plan this week despite recently sparring over similar measures in Utah and Texas. They argue the measure from Democratic state Assemblymember Buffy Wicks offers a more reasonable solution and hope it becomes a de facto national standard for other states weighing mandatory age-checks amid bipartisan concerns about kids’ safety online.

Archive : https://archive.is/MWWVH

1381
31
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy to c/privacy@programming.dev

A third of UK employers are using “bossware” technology to track workers’ activity with the most common methods including monitoring emails and web browsing.

Private companies are most likely to deploy in-work surveillance and one in seven employers are recording or reviewing screen activity, according to a UK-wide survey that estimates the extent of office snooping.

1382
122
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1383
25
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1384
49
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1385
48
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1386
36
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1387
34
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1388
70
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy to c/privacy@programming.dev

A national digital ID could hand the government the tools for population-wide surveillance – and if history is anything to go by, ministers probably couldn't run it without cocking it up.

That's the warning from Big Brother Watch in its new "Checkpoint Britain" report, published just days after Keir Starmer confirmed the government is considering a national digital identity scheme to tackle illegal immigration.

The civil liberties group says the government's argument that digital ID will meaningfully reduce illegal immigration or employment fraud is poorly substantiated and warns that touting digital ID as a political fix for migration problems is misleading. It argues that ministers have also been far too vague about the plan's scope, which it says could easily extend beyond right-to-work and right-to-rent checks to cover "online banking, booking a train ticket, shopping on Amazon, or scheduling a GP appointment."

The result would be a "checkpoint society" where identity checks become an unavoidable part of daily life, Big Brother Watch says.

1389
30
submitted 11 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/privacy@programming.dev

And all service providers/hosts around the world are expected to comply.

Here's one summary of the looming access control measures.

Reading and understanding all this (and the linked sources) feels so.. difficult, obtuse, complex.

1390
39
submitted 11 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/privacy@programming.dev
1391
46
submitted 11 months ago by cm0002@piefed.world to c/privacy@programming.dev
1392
15
submitted 11 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/privacy@programming.dev
1393
6
submitted 11 months ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/privacy@programming.dev
1394
12
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by iii@mander.xyz to c/privacy@programming.dev

A blocking minority has been found for the 4th time 🙂. See y'all in a couple of months when the EU commission makes the same proposal again! 🤝

Voters in:

  • Austria.
  • Belgium.
  • Czech Republic.
  • Finland.
  • Germany.
  • Luxemburg.
  • Netherlands.
  • Poland.

Your members of european parliament have made a good choice!

Voters in:

  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • Denmark (!)
  • France
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Lithuania
  • Malta
  • Portugal
  • Slovakia
  • Spain
  • Sweden

In 2029 there's new EU parliament elections. You can list your representatives on https://fightchatcontrol.eu/#delegates and make sure not to vote for them ever (again) 👍

1395
15
submitted 11 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/privacy@programming.dev
1396
60
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1397
333
submitted 11 months ago by iii@mander.xyz to c/privacy@programming.dev
1398
152
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by throws_lemy to c/privacy@programming.dev

I'm not sure what kind of algorithm they could use to find CSAM.

sauce

1399
40
submitted 11 months ago by Blaze@piefed.zip to c/privacy@programming.dev
1400
30
submitted 11 months ago by Sunshine@piefed.ca to c/privacy@programming.dev
view more: ‹ prev next ›

Privacy

5093 readers
163 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS