This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/showmeufos on 2024-10-02 20:00:03+00:00.
Ross Coulthart on July 7th, 2023 made a statement regarding a UFO "so big it can't be moved." Ross has since refused to share any further information about the location of that UFO despite in his initial claims suggesting that it'd be reported to Congress for them to investigate. As far as the public knows, that hasn't happened. Lue Elizondo also won't comment on the craft when asked. Doesn't mean it's true, just Lue won't touch it because it wasn't covered by his DOPSR.
Are there any other potential leads? Well, recently.... Recently one has surfaced on Twitter. Yes, it's Korea which has previously been discussed as potential location. However, now we have a specific historical reference to an incident stemming from a specific person (John Lear) and a document (The Matrix I book, page 235, published 1988).
Page 235 from "The Matrix - Understanding Aspects of Covert Interaction with Alien Culture, Technology and Planetary Power Structures"
This is a page from the book "The Matrix - Understanding Aspects of Covert Interaction with Alien Culture, Technology and Planetary Power Structures"
Specifically, pay attention to the highlighted text as well as this reference to time, which may give us an estimate of location:
Reference to a "saucer" "so enormous" that it caused "logistic problems in transportation so enormous that it was buried at the crash site and remains there today."
Credit to Twitter user CuriousNHI for pointing this out. This is not my discovery, this is theirs!
Unfortunately for us, John Lear has now passed away. He died in March of 2022, however, so it's plausible that he could have been a source for Ross Coulthart prior to his death. Whether or not you find John Lear credible is for you to decide.
Another Twitter user, in response to the posts about the page from this book, chimed in with this document, which references "Near Seoul S Korea - ET craft from 1970s," "downed in a mountain," "3 years to build." Admittedly the 1970s and "Korean war" (1950-1953) timeline would not match up, nonetheless, still interesting.
Document from Twitter user https://x.com/Gandalf_ElPulpo/status/1841333410125770843
There's also this image that Twitter user LaxSunnyG shared which would match up with the Korean War timeline. Size is unclear here. I do not know the origin of this image.
So, could this potentially be the origin of the UFO "so big it can't be moved" story? Maybe. Perhaps John Lear told Coulthart this, or Ross read the book as part of his research into UAP. As to what the exact building is in Korea =- I do not know. If you click into these Twitter threads I've linked to people discuss some possibilities. But I still found this interesting in establishing potential context and origin(s) for such a claim by Ross.
For reference, here are Ross's exact prior statements about this craft.
Ross: Okay, people are going to question what I'm about to say. What if some of that shit is so big it can't be moved?
Jay: Is that what you're saying Ross?
Ross: That's exactly what I'm saying.
Jay: How big is big?
Ross: Big. So big they built a building over it in a country outside of the United States of America. I know it sounds preposterous, and oh my god, you can just hear them now, the bleeping debunkers. Let's see this investigated. Let's just see what happens. Let's test these allegations before the Congress. It's very very easy for people to go "oh there's no evidence, oh my goodness my goodness me, let's just go away and ignore it." Let's test it. We haven't even got there yet. You know there's a whole cadre of experts on social media who are saying "it can't be therefore it isn't." And that's been the default for so many years. Imagine if what Mr. Grusch is true, think about the implications of that. And imagine as I've just intimated to you, some of these objects are not capable of being moved because they're too bloody big.
Jay: That's pretty astonishing, have you said that before?
Ross: No, no, you're the first. I always always save something for you Jay.
Jay: No seriously though, that's nuts. So you were told by someone, a trusted source I imagine...
Ross: Multiple. Multiple.
and then later in the interview:
Ross: It's absolutely gobsmacking that it's being kept this secret. Imagine having an object that's so big it's just not conceivable to move it. I thought it was bollocks when I heard it too, and most people will when they hear this anyway. Again, just an allegation, but one that I'm assured should be taken seriously and hopefully will be getting investigated by the Congress. Because again, where did the money come from, what's that money accounted for, the continued security and um control of such an object for many decades? Who has paid for that? What programs have paid for that? Has that been disclosed to taxpayers? This is gonna be a really fun inquiry if Congress starts doing its job.
Ross recently made the following statement reiterating he is not going to share the location:
"And it's quite funny. One of the things I talked about at one stage, and I wish I never had, was my knowledge of a very large non-human craft that was discovered, and was so large that it was hidden. And I can't reveal how it was hidden, but obviously there's something built over the top of it. I can't reveal where it is. And I've actually had death threats from lunatics on the web saying that I'm under an obligation to reveal it. But what I know is if I revealed the location of that object I'd put the lives of good men and women in the service of their country in jeopardy, because it's a place that's being used for a dual purpose. It's quite clever what they've done. And I have no intention of revealing it, absolutely none. And there are many examples of that, where journalists like myself, after consulting with people on the inside, we made a judgment about what we should and shouldn't reveal."
And Lue Elizondo was also asked about this location and made the following statement:
Interviewer: "Ross Coulthart, who you know well... discussed a UFO a while back that was so big that it couldn't be moved, and it was actually built over. And it's still used to this day as a working building. And I wonder if that's something you've heard of at the time, and how common could that be?
Lue: I unfortunately cannot discuss that. Um, I have to be very careful, I can discuss what is in the book because I have approval to do that. What you're referring to is something that I would not be able to confirm or deny. And let me be very clear with that, I cannot elaborate at all. If someone else has elaborated on it, that's fine. I have not been given any permission to discuss anything like that.
Interviewer: Help me then, because on a similar path, shapes are discussed, as well as size... on Joe Rogan you mentioned a USO. You mentioned a USO so big that it was the size of a small city block, captured off an oil rig. So some people are going to hear this and I'm used to the UFO conversation, but wonder why you can mention that, but not potentially the UFO under the building.
Lue: Because I'm not discussing sources and methods. I'm not discussing capabilities or locations. I'm not discussing an actual program, I'm discussing simply what was observed. You're asking me to confirm or deny something... the existence of something, I don't have permission to do that. What I can do is from my personal observations I've seen video of an event, right? But I'm not saying where that event is, under what circumstances, what collection capabilities, where that place was, how long ago it was... you know, I'm not giving any of that. You know, it's just anecdotal. That in itself isn't classified. If I give you details of that, I could get in serious trouble so I'm very careful not to do that.
