The UFO reddit

132 readers
1 users here now

A community for discussion related to Unidentified Flying Objects. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. We aim to elevate...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
451
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/seabritain on 2024-09-26 16:44:17+00:00.


An important source for this research was The Taking of K-129 by Josh Dean.

I also highly recommend this excellent piece by undersc0red: General Motors, Glomar Explorer, Lockheed Martin & UAP Connections

In 1954, an agreement was signed by Director of Central Intelligence Allen Dulles and General Nathan Twining, then Chief of Staff of the Air Force, regarding the development of the U-2 spy plane. A small group of about six people, headed by Dulles’ special assistant Richard Bissell and Herbert Miller, Chief of the Office of Scientific Intelligence’s Nuclear Energy Division, began work under the vaguely named Project Staff. It transformed into the Development Projects Staff in 1958 and would officially become the Office of Special Activities in 1962, residing in the newly formed Directorate of Science & Technology. DPS “existed outside of the regular Agency operations, with its own security and communications system” in order to maintain the utmost secrecy.

In 1963, the Special Projects Staff was formed in the Directorate of Science & Technology, taking over the responsibility for satellite programs from the Office of Special Activities. It was officially designated the Office of Special Projects in 1965.

A new Special Projects Staff was established on July 1, 1969 within Carl Duckett’s DS&T with John Parangosky as its head and naval submarine officer Ernest Zellmer as his deputy. The unit was responsible for the planning the retrieval of a sunken Soviet submarine and the creation of the Hughes Glomar Explorer under Project Azorian. Zellmer oversaw the project’s day-to-day operations for the next six years.

The National Underwater Reconnaissance Office was formally established on August 19, 1969, its organization modeled after the NRO by Parangosky with help from Gene Poteat, who notably had headed Project Palladium. Robert Frosch, Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research and Development, was named its staff director. Zellmer served as Frosch’s “special assistant”. Frosch was Director of Research at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute from 1975-1977 before becoming NASA’s fifth Administrator. He was was appointed vice president of research and development at General Motors Research Laboratories in 1982.

From a journal entry by Jacques Vallee:

Hummingbird. Friday 7 January 1994. …“The reality of an undercurrent, actively driven from Washington, is becoming increasingly obvious. The enigmatic Dan T. Smith is setting up meetings all over the Bay Area, again claiming direction from Pandolfi. He dangles money and rumors, arranging luncheons with people, taking their photographs, taping conversations. He claims that Robert Frosh [sic] (former NASA boss, now at GM) ran a secret UFO study at the Johnson Spacecraft Center in the mid-1970s along with Kit [Green], using microwaves to study their effect on human behavior.”

More from Vallee:

Athanor. Friday 8 March 2002. Now I must review the remarkable exchanges we've had with Kit over the last two weeks. On March 5th he wrote: “I never interviewed the surgeons who did the prosection (can't say “autopsy” if not done by a credited pathologist) but I read their purported notes. They looked fine. In fact, the arcanalia of the way a doctor describes dissection are weird enough, I have never believed the notes were hoaxes.... In this business, high-quality science isn't the first thought of the persons trying to find consultants. Bronk had credentials but wasn't qualified. Stahl was qualified and had credentials but was not on the inside. Hynek was credentialed but had no medical qualifications. The ‘surgeons’ were cleared but had neither credentials nor qualifications.” Later the same day, he added: “I do now recall that I spoke with one Air Force physician... Donald Flickinger MD, Brigadier General....about the Alien autopsy material. He was a consultant to me on soviet spacecraft, Apollo-Soyuz and later brought me on as his consultant on the Glomar Explorer project, where he was the medical director, and asked me to take on the job as Forensic Analyst of the remains. For about ten years he was the Executive Secretary of the VIP health program in my division of the CIA managed by Myles Maxfield, MD, PhD. Myles was ever-so-much my academic superior, but I was the Administrative Director of the program. Don told me he had seen the autopsy material, too... many years earlier, when he was the first Air Force MD to make the rank of General Officer, post the manned spaceflight effort, the medical portion of which he headed. He told me it was all real. He told me that in 1994, after I had known him well for 16 years. But he was never able to get me cleared for that program, as he was for the Jennifer program.”

A little more:

Las Vegas. Sunday 28 March 2004. …How likely is it that such a project would have 800 cleared names on its list? Surprisingly, that’s possible. Kit said that “Project Jennifer, the Glomar Explorer, had over 5,000 names. That doesn’t mean these folks knew what was going on; the levels were severely controlled. I was never cleared for it while at the Agency. General Don Flickinger kept telling me he was working on getting me cleared, but he never did. “Once I was at GM, and got the clearance, a lot of people with whom I had been working before, some of them for twelve years, tapped me on the shoulder with congratulations: ‘Glad to have you on board!’ but I had never suspected they were part of it. The funding was interesting: Jennifer was a CIA project but it was funded laterally out of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) budget, and even the Director of Central Intelligence was not cleared for it, although he knew there was ‘a project.’ This may be similar. Typically, the integrating contractor is not the operating contractor.”

Flickinger had headed the U-2 aeromedical program and served as Project Aquatone’s medical advisor for nearly a decade.

In 1961, a man named Norm Nelson had been handpicked by Parangosky, Bissell’s assistant and chief of DPS, to serve as a plant and “babysitter” in Kelly Johnson’s Skunk Works, Lockheed’s Advanced Products Development company. Nelson would report directly to Bissell during this time. He was later embedded at Azorian’s program office as the project kicked off, taking on the role of “Parangosky’s spy—his eyes and ears—and the two had daily debriefs by phone”. He oversaw Glomar Explorer project for Hughes Tool Company then returned to Skunk Works in 1976, where he became program manager and chief engineer of the stealth fighter programs under Ben Rich. He was vice president and general manager of the Skunk Works from 1984-1988.

Dick Sampson joined the Office of Special Activities in 1964. Sampson “wrote the first industrial security manual for special projects, his manual becoming the forerunner to the current manual at Area 51”, and is credited with creating the call sign JANET for EG&G’s commuter flights that transported workers between Las Vegas, Area 51, and Burbank. Sampson was swapped into Norm Nelson’s role in 1965 and established DDS&T’s Western Industrial Liaison Detachment, which was located in the same building that would house Project Azorian. He served as commander of the Area 51 test facility at Groom Lake from 1969-1971, then would later become chief of the Commercial Division, Special Projects Staff, playing a major role in the Glomar project. After leaving the CIA in 1976, he took a job as manager of Special Projects at Hughes Aircraft Company's Radar Systems Group until 1980. After Hughes, he became manager of Security and Protective Services for Northrop's Advanced Systems Division during top secret development of the B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber and would remain at Northrop until his retirement in the early 1990s.

In a 2022 interview with Bobby Ray In...


Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fq0reg/cia_legacy_program_nuro_skunk_works_the_office_of/

452
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/frognbadger on 2024-09-26 16:39:33+00:00.


Howdy UFOs,

Today, I want to hammer down the chronology of regulations involved with financial reporting that ostensibly allow the UAP Legacy Program and other covert operations to exist without appropriate disclosure to relevant authorities or the American people. I've covered several companies and other audits in prior posts, and if you're interested in reading up on these, the links are down below. However, I will do my best to summarize pertinent information from each so this post can "live on its own". I will preface this in saying that this post does not have anything to do with UAPs directly, but as said previously, the discussion herein revolves around the legal and financial framework that allows these types of operations to exist in government and private industry, with relevant discussion on UAP disclosure events that might have correlation.

My Priors:

Strange Footnote Disclosure: SAIC and Leidos under criminal DoJ antitrust investigation

Audit of Battelle's Contract at Oak Ridge National Laboratory

The 1993 DoD SAP Administrative Due Process Audit by GAO, possible connection to Wilson-Davis memo

Also, before I really get into it, I want to give a HUGE shout-out to Catherine Austin Fitts's Solari Reports for helping me fill in the research gaps I've been working on for the past year. Her website, missingmoney.solari.com , is a treasure trove of financial and legal information on black budget programs within the federal government and private industry. If you want a better understanding of how this stuff works from a legal/financial perspective, I highly encourage you to take a look at her reports on her website going back to the early 2000s.

And with that, let's start with a question:

What laws are on the books around non-disclosure of national security information, such as UAP reverse engineering programs, in financial reporting and corporate communications?

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Section 13(b)(3)(A) Exemption

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, colloquially known as "the SEC Act", was the law that formed the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) in the wake of the Great Depression. This tremendously important law codified many of the financial and legal regulations that serve as the backbone for financial reporting today.

However, few are aware of specific exemptions written into the law, namely Section 13(b)(3)(A) (page 123 in link). With respect to matters concerning national security of the United States, the President or the head of an Executive Branch agency may exempt companies from certain critical legal obligations. These obligations include keeping accurate "books, records, and accounts" and maintaining "a system of internal accounting controls sufficient" to ensure the propriety of financial transactions of the preparation of financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

For all intents and purposes, this was the first exemption written into law over non-disclosure of information in financial reports in matters pertaining to national security, and the ultimate power in granting the exemption was put in the hands of the President and the heads of the Executive agencies. (More on this later in the post.)

The Code of Federal Regulations

The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) is an extensive collection of general and permanent rules and regulations published by the executive agencies of the United States government. The code is organized into 50 titles, and each governs a certain agency or aspect of agency operations. Many following the current UAP disclosure narrative will probably remember the discussions last year around security clearances and accesses for the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), namely AARO having certain clearances to IC programs through Title 50. CFR Title 50 governs Intelligence Community (IC) activities, and Title 10 governs DoD activities, for example.

However, there is not a lot of discussion around similar private industry regulations, which could be important given allegations that UAP materials are being held by certain private aerospace and defense corporations. Title 17 of the CFR contains regulations issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). These laws help form the basis for things like financial reporting, SEC reporting requirements, and disclosure of non-financial information for corporate entities.

In May 1968, 17 CFR 240.0-6 was codified, titled:

Disclosure detrimental to the national defense or foreign policy

17 CFR 240.0-6

a) Any requirement to the contrary notwithstanding, no registration statement, report, or proxy statement or other document filed with the Commission (SEC) or any securities exchange shall contain any document or information which, pursuant to Executive order, has been classified by an appropriate department or agency of the United States for protection in the interests of national defense or foreign policy.

b) Where a document or information is omitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, there shall be filed, in lieu of such document or information, a statement from an appropriate department or agency of the United States to the effect that such document or information has been classified or that the status thereof is awaiting determination. Where a document is omitted pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, but information relating to the subject matter of such document is nevertheless included in material filed with the Commission (SEC) pursuant to a determination of an appropriate department or agency of the United States that disclosure of such information would not be contrary to the interests of national defense or foreign policy, a statement from such department or agency to that effect shall be submitted for the information of the Commission (SEC). A registrant may rely upon any such statement in filing or omitting any document or information to which the statement relates.

c) The Commission (SEC) may protect any information in its possession which may require classification in the interests of national defense or foreign policy pending determination by an appropriate department or agency as to whether such information should be classified.

d) It shall be the duty of the registrant to submit the documents or information referred to in paragraph (a) of this section to the appropriate department or agency of the United States prior to filing them with the Commission (SEC) and to obtain and submit to the Commission (SEC), at the time of filing such documents or information, or in lieu thereof, as the case may be, the statements from such department or agency required by paragraph (b) of this section. All such statements shall be in writing.

Analysis:

Paragraph (a) is the actionable clause here, as it mandates SEC registrants, basically defined as companies filing reports with the SEC, to not submit or disclose documents pertaining to sensitive information or programs classified by the President or an executive agency. This basically allows companies involved in the defense and/or intelligence industry to disclose their financial operations without getting into specifics about what those operations may entail, particularly when those operations pertain to classified projects. Ultimately, the regulation puts the legal burden on the company and the relevant classification authority (IC or DoD agencies and/or POTUS) to withhold documents from the SEC in good faith under paragraphs (b) and (d). The relevant classification authority is required to submit statements to the SEC to the effect of, "this program is classified and therefore we encourage you waive reporting requirements pertaining to this particular operation." It is not unreasonable to assume these statements to the SEC may be general or vague, depending on the nature of the program.

17 CFR 240.0-6 allows for non-disclosure of sensitive programs and information, thus decreasing the risk of inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures in financial reporting or other company communications. Soon after this regulation passed, a large swath of defense companies conducted IPOs and went public in the following years. While not an exhaustive list, here's a brief of defense companies that went public after the CFR was added (and therefore subject to SEC regulations):

CACI, October 1968

Honeywell International, January 1970

General Dynamics, January 1977

BAE Systems, February 1981 (on London Stock Exchange, but trades in US so still under SEC laws)

Northrup Grumman, December 1981

Lockheed Martin, March 1995, after Lockheed-Martin Marietta merger

AND Full Disclosure, Defense Companies who were public BEFORE 17 CFR 240.0-6:

Raytheon Company...


Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fq0n8i/hidden_ledger_legal_financial_framework_of_the/

453
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/blackvault on 2024-09-26 16:22:52+00:00.

454
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/0XKINET1 on 2024-09-26 14:52:10+00:00.


It appears to be able to somewhat out maneuver tracking technology.

455
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/frankievalentino on 2024-09-26 13:10:42+00:00.

456
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Dukeondemand on 2024-09-26 12:11:56+00:00.

457
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/silv3rbull8 on 2024-09-26 11:57:57+00:00.

458
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/pebberphp on 2024-09-26 11:49:26+00:00.

459
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/microwavable-iPhone on 2024-09-26 07:44:51+00:00.

460
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/ValiantWarrior83 on 2024-09-26 05:04:52+00:00.

461
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/FireWallxQc on 2024-09-26 02:10:38+00:00.

462
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Jest_Kidding420 on 2024-09-26 00:07:08+00:00.


The truth is, we already have all the information available to take a stand! We know exactly why this technology is being hidden—from the economic paradigm shift it would cause, to the inability to control the population due to the profound physics backed spiritual and consciousness aspects involved (see Hal Puthoff for reference).

Why do you think he is at the center of this phenomenon from multiple angles? The study of consciousness is crucial in conjunction with plasma physics, with plasma being key to all of this. This ranges from how our alien reproduction vehicles operate to the reality that many UFOs are conscious, living plasmas. Numerous pilot encounters with "foo fighters" describe their sightings as if the objects were playing with them or putting on a show.

Here is an archive from "Eyes on Cinema" containing over 50 video testimonies:

Furthermore, by utilizing this aspect of space, Plasma / Ball Lightning (which has largely been swept under the rug), the military-industrial complex developed:

TELEPORTATION – Refer to the MH370 videos:

Along with Salvatore Pais's patents for the Navy:

Also, see the DIA paper on "Traversable Wormholes, Stargates, and Negative Energy":

WARP DRIVE – Refer to the DIA papers on "Warp Drive, Dark Energy, and the Manipulation of Extra Dimensions" (extra dimensions meaning "The Æther"):

ANTIGRAVITY – See the DIA paper "Antigravity for Aerospace Applications":

As well as "Negative Mass Propulsion":

FREE ENERGY or ZERO POINT FIELD/RADIANT ENERGY – See the DIA papers on "Concepts for Extracting Energy From the Quantum Vacuum":


Now, tie this together with the questionable behavior and practices of the American military and government, and it's hard to avoid arriving at the same conclusion—unless, of course, you're in denial.

THE STUDY OF BALL LIGHTNING AND OTHER PLASMA FORMS IS THE KEY!

Additionally, these plasmas or ball lightning have the capacity to be conscious, representing the interdimensional aspect of the phenomenon. The zero-point field, Æther, or subspace—whatever you choose to call it—connects every point in the universe. This field also explains why humans can experience extrasensory perception (ESP), such as remote viewing, telepathy, clairvoyance, and premonitions. Our consciousness exists in this ætheric realm, meaning it is non-localized.

For reference, see the CIA Gateway Process papers:

We are plasma entities having a human experience. Many UFOs are plasmas without a corporal body, entering our dimension as highly electrically charged space dust.

———————————————————————————

It's so obvious that many of these UFOs are of plasma origin, and in many cases, they are conscious plasma from the Æther. These entities have been responsible for many ancient angelic encounters, the djinn, biblically accurate angels, and other etheric beings.

Don’t get me wrong, I know there are also nuts-and-bolts craft and even a Galactic Federation, as the Israeli space defense chief of 20 years has stated, along with a few other high-level individuals. We even have physical alien bodies from Peru—over 60 of them—with, I believe, four different species identified so far, including tall grays, small grays, mantis creatures, and even one that resembles the being Aleister Crowley claimed gave him information. You can find a dedicated site analyzing these bodies here:

We also now have the truth about Roswell, which has finally come to light. This proves that the government is as shady as ever and will lie, lie, lie! This should give you the motivation to look into the technology behind the MH370 teleportation videos, where monopole plasmas were developed, ripping a hole in the fabric of space. All of the information has been presented above.

Regarding plasmas, if you refer to the document below, it specifically discusses using plasmas for this very technology..

Below are some excerpts from "Project Condign," along with the corresponding page numbers for reference:

Page 2-2: SHAPES, SIZES, AND STRUCTURES

  1. ⁠Bead Lightning Occasionally described as a ‘string of sausages’ (elongated beads), bead lightning can merge into a single glowing ball as the high-field pinching effect subsides. The following shapes and structural types have been reported: ⁠• ⁠Shapes: Typically globes, occasionally with internal flames. Rare sightings include two linked balls, pear-shaped forms, torus, rod-shaped systems, or hollow spheres. ⁠• ⁠Structures: (a) Solid-appearing balls with reflective surfaces or a solid core inside a translucent envelope (30-50 cm in diameter). (b) Rotating structures. (c) A burning appearance (typically around 40 cm in diameter).There are also reports of single balls breaking up into smaller ones.

Page 2-3: MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

The observed motions include a wide range of directional and dynamic behaviors, such as:

• ⁠Cloud-to-cloud, earth-to-cloud, or cloud-to-earth movement. • ⁠Horizontal paths (55% of reports, often for the burning type). • ⁠Climbing, bouncing, changing course, and even moving against the wind. • ⁠Rapid point-to-point motion (jumping or darting). • ⁠Attraction to enclosed spaces (vehicles, indoors), rolling on the ground, emerging from lakes, or hovering. • ⁠Spinning, floating, diving at high speed, moving at wind speed, and other complex trajectories (20% of reports). • ⁠Interaction with objects, including attaching to or pushing at objects, or floating away. • ⁠Some phenomena seem to move in a vortex pattern or squeeze through small openings before expanding.

Page 2-4: LIGHT CHARACTERISTICS

Most observations fall into the following color categories:

• ⁠Blue or blue/green • ⁠Red, pink/rose-pink, or red changing to white • ⁠Violet changing to white • ⁠Yellow or yellow changing to white • ⁠Red/yellow types are predominant (60% of reports), sometimes surrounded by a bluish envelope. Less than 1% change color. • ⁠Emission of sparks or fireworks-like trails, and in some cases, a mist (brown, blue, or white, depending on lighting conditions). • ⁠Some reports include glowing tentacles and rapid sphere rotation.

Additionally, ball lightning can sometimes leave behind a smoky trail or emit bright flashes of light, with occasional pulsating colors or smells (brown mist).

463
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Library-Practical on 2024-09-26 02:26:35+00:00.


I think this is the classified information Andre Carson was briefed on recently regarding the James Webb space telescope. Apparently her source was stating that pine gap in Australia is where the information is coming in regarding the JWST. It’s all coming together it seems. What do you guys think? The 6 planets with artificial light is near the end of her interview with Lue Elizondo

464
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/shogun2909 on 2024-09-26 01:39:34+00:00.

465
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TommyShelbyPFB on 2024-09-26 00:16:45+00:00.

466
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/kats-tattoos on 2024-09-26 00:05:46+00:00.

467
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PyroIsSpai on 2024-09-25 22:25:21+00:00.

468
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/jaan_dursum on 2024-09-25 20:57:16+00:00.


Dated: June 16th, 1971, New York Times

JAMES MCDONALD, A CLOUD PHYSICIST

About the ArchiveThis is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996. To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them.Occasionally the digitization process introduces transcription errors or other problems; we are continuing to work to improve these archived versions.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

TUCSON, Ariz., June 15 (UPI) —Dr. James E. McDonald, nationally known University of Arizona physicist, was found dead in a desert area Sunday, an apparent suicide. He was 51 years old, Dr. McDonald was a senior physicist specializing in clouds at the university's Institute of Atmospheric Physics and was credited with contributions to the advancement of cloud physics and weather modification research.

Authorities said Dr. McDonald had died of a head wound and that a note and a.38 revolver were found beside’ the body.

A Respected Scientist Dr. McDonald, a member of the National. Academy of Sciences, was the most outspoken scientific proponent of the possibility that unidentified flying objects might be under control from beyond the earth.

In July, 1968, he told the House Committee on Space and Astronautics that, the world's scientific community “tended to discount and regard as nonsense” reports of saucer sightings. Serious attempts at studies had been “laughed out of court,” he said.

Conceding that this was because of a lack of scientific data, he asserted that these same scientists would not support the collection of such data.

The tall sandy‐haired physicist, with degrees also in chemistry and meteorology, was already a respected scientist when he took issue with what he considered deliberate Government efforts to “debunk” U.F.O. sightings.

Dr. McDonald held that the Air Force, which had commissioned a study of the phenomenon, was “blissfully unaware of the serious problem that it has on its hands” in stating that it could explain all but a handful of U.F.O. sightings as natural phenomena or government projects. He believed that the U.F.O.'s were real and probably come from outer space.

He embarked on a speaking crusade two years ago, challenging the Air Force's Condon Report, in ‘Which most U.F.O. sightings were linked to satellites, weather ‘balloons, clouds, birds and other explainable causes.

Dr. McDonald also suggested that the U.F.O.'s might have been related to, power failures in New York.

Dr. McDonald was in the news last year when he told specialists of the Department of Transportation at a private hearing that a full fleet of supersonic transport planes would reduce the protective layer of ozone in the atmosphere that screens out some of the harmful ultra‐violet rays of the sun.

He estimated that the SST's would cause an additional 10,000 cases of skin cancer annually in this country.

On May 2 this year, when he gave this testimony at a House Appropriations Committee hearing, some members were ready to discount it because of his earlier views on U.F.O.'s.

Two weeks later, a National Cancer Institute specialist suggested that Dr. McDonald's estimate of the impact on skin cancer was, if anything, too conservative. Another scientist, Dr. J. G. Charney, Sloan professor of meteorology at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and an opponent of the SST, said that Dr. McDonald's views on U.F.O.'s were unorthodox but “should be regarded as evidence of his honest and fearless pursuit of the truth.”

Dr. McDonald was born in Duluth, Minn., and received his bachelor's degree from the University of Omaha in 1942.

After World War II service in the Navy he received his M.S. from M.I.T. in 1945. He taught and earned his Ph.D. at Iowa State College, where he became an assistant professor.

After a year at the University of Chicago as a resident cloud physicist in the meteorology department, he went to the University of Arizona in 1954 as an associate professor. His appointment as professor of meteorology and climatology and as senior physicist in its Institute of Atmospheric Physics followed.

469
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/JustJer on 2024-09-25 15:09:52+00:00.

Original Title: Not to be a huge downer or anything but regarding the photo of the "horseshoe" UAP, here's another photo of a Chinese spy balloon that better conveys what people are saying about the possible angle and poor quality of the photo creating the illusion of a crescent shaped aircraft

470
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TommyShelbyPFB on 2024-09-25 20:25:12+00:00.

Original Title: Sen. Rand Paul and his team still refuse to go on record to deny that he gutted the UAPDA. 2 weeks ago Lester Nare got word that Rand Paul and Mitch McConnell were gearing up to oppose the UAPDA and gave us a heads up.

471
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/showmeufos on 2024-09-25 19:57:00+00:00.


Many in the r/UFOs community are familiar with "2027" as a year that may be relevant to disclosure. I thus far have not seen any particularly compelling set of reasons why this would be the case, so I figured I'd share one potential reason: United States classification laws.

Disclosure: I am not an expert in classification laws. I am not a lawyer, and I do not work in the intelligence community, so some of this may be incorrect. If you spot something incorrect please mention it in comments and I'll do my best to adjust the post. All of this is just from my own personal research into this subject that I thought was nonetheless worth sharing.

The U.S. National Archives maintains a page from their "Information Security Oversight Office" (ISOO) with a list of ISOO notices. Some of these notices (archive.org backup link for posterity since their February release of the same document was revised in June and is no longer available on their site... so much for "National Archive") describe automatic declassification timelines, as well as exemptions to those timelines.

The document we'll be looking at today is the "ISOO Notice 2024-02: Agencies Eligible to Receive Referrals from Automatic Declassification at 25, 50, and 75 Years" which describes agencies that "have received approval from the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) to exempt specific information from automatic declassification and may receive referrals resulting from automatic declassification reviews."

The US agencies covered by this document are:

  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
  • Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
  • Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)
  • Department of the Air Force (Air Force)
  • Department of the Army (Army)
  • Department of Energy (DOE)
  • Department of Homeland Security, only for the following two component organizations: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
  • United States Secret Service (USSS)
  • Department of Justice (DOJ)
  • Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
  • Department of the Navy (Navy)
  • Department of State (State)
  • Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP)
  • United States Mint
  • Joint Staff, and the following Combatant Commands:
  • United States Central Command (CENTCOM)
  • United States European Command (EUCOM)
  • United States Northern Command (NORTHCOM)/North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD)
  • United States Pacific Command (PACOM)
  • United States Southern Command (SOUTHCOM)
  • United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM)
  • United States Transportation Command (TRANSCOM)
  • Missile Defense Agency (MDA)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  • National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)
  • National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)
  • Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
  • National Security Agency (NSA)
  • National Security Council (NSC)
  • Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)

The current prevailing executive order pertaining to the handling of classified information is Executive Order 13526- Classified National Security Information - signed December 29, 2009 under Obama. That order establishes the following:

Sec. 1.5.  Duration of Classification.  (a)  At the time of original classification, the original classification authority shall establish a specific date or event for declassification based on the duration of the national security sensitivity of the information.  Upon reaching the date or event, the information shall be automatically declassified.  Except for information that should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction, the date or event shall not exceed the time frame established in paragraph (b) of this section.

(b)  If the original classification authority cannot determine an earlier specific date or event for declassification, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years from the date of the original decision, unless the original classification authority otherwise determines that the sensitivity of the information requires that it be marked for declassification for up to 25 years from the date of the original decision.

So the "default" classification duration for information would be 10 years, and "sensitive" information is marked 25 years. Information is supposed to be automatically declassified after these durations. In reality, almost all information that is notable is considered "sensitive" and appears to fall under this 25 year declassification timeframe. Also, notably, that same order states:

(d)  No information may remain classified indefinitely.  Information marked for an indefinite duration of classification under predecessor orders, for example, marked as "Originating Agency's Determination Required," or classified information that contains incomplete declassification instructions or lacks declassification instructions shall be declassified in accordance with part 3 of this order.

So keeping information classified forever should generally be unlawful. However, note that this also refers to "part 3" of this order. Part 3 is "PART 3 -- DECLASSIFICATION AND DOWNGRADING" and contains several sections relating to the authorities for declassification, the transferring of records, and notably, section 3.3, automatic declassification. That section reads:

Automatic Declassification.  (a)  Subject to paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(j) of this section, all classified records that (1) are more than 25 years old and (2) have been determined to have permanent historical value under title 44, United States Code, shall be automatically declassified whether or not the records have been reviewed.  All classified records shall be automatically declassified on December 31 of the year that is 25 years from the date of origin, except as provided in paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(i) of this section.  If the date of origin of an individual record cannot be readily determined, the date of original classification shall be used instead.

That section goes on to state the following:

(b)  An agency head may exempt from automatic declassification under paragraph (a) of this section specific information, the release of which should clearly and demonstrably be expected to:

And here we get into a list of reasons that allow for automatic exemption from declassification. "Documents are exempt from the 25-year timeline as defined in section 1.5b, for the following reasons" (pay attention to the specific section numbers here too, we will refer to them later):

  1. reveal the identity of a confidential human source*, a human intelligence source, a relationship with an intelligence or security service of a foreign government or international organization, or a nonhuman intelligence source; or impair the effectiveness of an intelligence method currently in use, available for use, or under development;*
  2. reveal information that would assist in the development, production, or use of weapons of mass destruction;
  3. reveal information that would impair U.S. cryptologic systems or activities;
  4. reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system;
  5. reveal formally named or numbered U.S. military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements of prior plans that are contained in such active plans;
  6. reveal information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government*, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States;*
  7. reveal information that would impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of the national security, are authorized;
  8. reveal information that would seriously impair current national security emergency preparedness plans or reveal current vulnerabilities of systems, installations, or infrastructures relating to the national security*; or*
  9. violate a statute, treaty, or international agreement that does not permit the automatic or unilateral declassification of information at 25 years.

Those are the 9 categories of reasoning allowed for exemption under the automatic 25-year declassification process. Now, if we refer back to the "ISOO Notice 2024-02: Agencies Eligible to Receive Referrals from Automatic Declassification at 25, 50, and 75 Years" document...


Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fpdovl/2027_is_there_reasoning_for_the_2027_date_being/

472
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/darthmushroom on 2024-09-25 16:57:58+00:00.


Gary McKinnon spoke about this when he hacked the military database. He spoke of a space fleet under the name Solar Warden. He mentioned two names, USSS Hillenkoetter and USSS Curtis Lemay.

Does the image look familiar to any one out there reading this? Have there been any recent updates regarding these claims? Searching these terms online is futile, everything has been scrubbed. McKinnon also mentioned non terrestrial officers. I have tried to find the latest information but the only news available is that they are going to make a film about Gary McKinnon's battle against extradition to the US. Many thanks in advance for any new information anyone can provide!

473
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/LordBritton on 2024-09-25 16:44:15+00:00.

474
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/silv3rbull8 on 2024-09-25 15:56:03+00:00.

475
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/NewParadigmInstitute on 2024-09-25 15:09:48+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›