This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/disclosurediaries on 2024-09-10 00:21:54+00:00.

This past week in Disclosure:

Sep 4 – Donald Trump claims to be willing to declassify additional UAP-related documents/photos/videos

In a Lex Fridman interview, President Trump is asked whether he will support the declassification of additional UFO-related data if re-elected:

*"*Lex: Will you help push the Pentagon to release more [UAP] footage, which a lot of people claim is available?

Trump: Oh yeah sure, I'll do that. I'd love to do that. I have to do that. But they also are pushing me on Kennedy. And I did release a lot, but I had people come to me and beg me not to do that – but I'll be doing that very early on."

Sep 5 – Jon Kosloski, the new director of AARO, is reportedly a former member of the UAP Task Force

According to Jay Stratton during a panel at Phenomecon –

"The good news is I got a text a few weeks ago from a good friend of mine who was part of the UAP Task Force, Jon Kosloski, and he said 'I just got the AARO job'. He's good, he's trustworthy"

The UAPTF is the same task force that Grusch, Jay Stratton, Karl Nell, and other such whistleblowers were involved with/a part of in the past.

Sep 5 – Rep. Burchett continues to be frustrated by perceived Congressional obfuscation of UAP transparency

In a recent interview, Congressman Tim Burchett continues to voice his frustration with regards to (what he sees as) continued and intentional hindrance of UAP transparency occurring within Congress and the Intelligence/Defense community.

He also describes a recent UAP encounter that was relayed to him by a US jet pilot, where a craft reportedly came within 14 feet of his cockpit.

Sep 6 – Former US National Security Advisor claims that "there are phenomena that have been witnessed by multiple people that are just inexplicable by the science available to us."

H.R. McMasters, a retired United States Army lieutenant general who served as the 25th United States National Security Advisor from 2017 to 2018, makes a notable admission regarding UAP during an interview with Bill Maher:

“There are phenomena that have been witnessed by multiple people that are just inexplicable by the science available to us.”

For reference – McMaster made Time's list of 100 most influential people in the world in April 2014. He was hailed as "the architect of the future U.S. Army" in the accompanying piece.

Things to look out for in the near future:

September

• According to Senator Gillibrand – a public hearing in line with AARO's latest report can be expected soon, saying –"I’m hoping July, and if not then September. But I’m trying to do July.”
• Speaking with Askapol, Reps. Luna and Burchett indicated that the next UAP hearing is likely to come after the August recess

Beyond/currently unknown

• Following the UAP hearing on the 26th of July, Members of Congress have called for a select committee with subpoena authority, to “go about the task of collecting information from the Pentagon and elsewhere” on unidentified flying objects. There have been conflicting messages from various Members of Congress on whether this is likely to happen anytime soon. Note – a select subcommittee was formally requested on March 13th.
• Reps. Moskowitz, Luna, and Burchett have repeatedly stated their intent to hold field hearings to overcome stonewalling from the Pentagon and military establishment "I think we [Congress] should try to get into one of these places [housing UAP evidence]...and if they won't let us in I think we should have a field hearing right outside the building...and the military will have to explain why that is." – Rep. Moskowitz (D) It is currently unknown when exactly we might expect that to occur, however as of Jan 12 – Rep. Luna confirmed: "I feel confident that we have enough evidence to move forward with our first field hearing. We will be announcing details soon."
• Several journalists have indicated that first-hand witnesses of the alleged UAP legacy programs are in the process of providing testimony/evidence to the relevant authorities (e.g. the IC IG) and/or are on the verge of making public statements in the near future (Example 1, example 2, example 3, example 4)
• David Grusch has received additional clearances through DOPSR to discuss some of his (alleged) first-hand knowledge of Legacy programs. He has mentioned he may be covering more of this information in an upcoming Op-Ed

Skimmed through this post but need a quick refresher on how we got to this point? Check out this handy Disclosure Timeline to get up to speed.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/halfway123 on 2024-09-10 02:31:31+00:00.

Technically it was Dr. Lacatski who said it, but I explain more in the article. This post will be a TLDR of my article but essentially Dr. James T. Ryder:

• was an expert (Ph.D) in materials engineering
• worked at Lockheed from 1973 to 2011, ultimately managing more than $9 billion for Lockheed Martin Space Systems
• worked as a contractor for NASA and Air Force Material Laboratory, part of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
• knew Dr. Eric Davis and Dr. Hal Puthoff, and was a part of the SAFIRE project
• gave presentations to The Lucis Trust about UFO’s, theories of light and gravity, and the role of science
• knew about ESP/Remote viewing and the Collin’s Elite

With all this I make the argument that he was part of ‘The Legacy Program.’ He worked on UFO material and tried to give it to AAWSAP but was shutdown by the CIA. I encourage you to read your article and share your thoughts. Thank you!

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/delucho on 2024-09-10 02:01:55+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Nacho_Libre_Ahora on 2024-09-10 01:12:41+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/resonantedomain on 2024-09-10 01:05:16+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/aryelbcn on 2024-09-10 00:57:38+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/AURORASPECTRE91 on 2024-09-09 21:17:11+00:00.

"Legendary George Knapp was on the Last Stories On The Left Podcast with Jeremy Corbell as well. In the episode Knapp discussed being told that the program was indeed real and people would be going to prison should disclosure happen. Will this help the UAPDA. Kristian Harloff discusses."

Answer: Lie. We will all be very fine.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/MR_PRESIDENT__ on 2024-09-10 00:28:29+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/aryelbcn on 2024-09-09 22:44:48+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/efh1 on 2024-09-09 22:21:53+00:00.

Of course this is speculative in nature, but there's nothing wrong with informed speculation. Sometimes, if it happens to be at least on the right track, it can help us discover new pieces of evidence. It's not speculative to say that information about UFOs and nuclear technology are both very secretive. It's not a new idea that nuclear technology is related to UFOs. It is, however, a newer idea that there could be implications to the fields of cosmology and general human progress. Weinstein is perhaps the most notable current figure to suggest intentional dysfunction within physics communities in order to cover up technological progress and keep the entire field of physics dormant for decades. Weinstein typically illustrates this idea through the lens of the dominance and failures of String Theory. I believe it's possible to do the same through the lens of cosmology.

In cosmology, the steady-state model or steady state theory is an alternative to the Big Bang theory. In the steady-state model, the density of matter in the expanding universe remains unchanged due to a continuous creation of matter, thus adhering to the perfect cosmological principle, a principle that says that the observable universe is always the same at any time and any place.

From the 1940s to the 1960s, the astrophysical community was divided between supporters of the Big Bang theory and supporters of the steady-state theory. The steady-state model is now rejected by most cosmologists, astrophysicists, and astronomers. I could go into more detail about when and why this happened, but it's not pertinent at the moment.

However, if you understand the arguments made by Eric Weinstein about the current state of academia you should understand that you should be skeptical of the "consensus" among certain academic circles because they have demonstrated that they are not acting rationally nor scientifically despite their prestigious status and backgrounds. Diversity of ideas is not encouraged to put it lightly.

Hannes Alfvén and Cosmology

Opposition to the Big Bang theory was very small by the 1970's with its most prestigious detractors being from the plasma physics community. Plasma cosmology is a non-standard cosmology whose central postulate is that the dynamics of ionized gases and plasmas play important, if not dominant, roles in the physics of the universe at interstellar and intergalactic scales. In contrast, the current observations and models of cosmologists and astrophysicists explain the formation, development, and evolution of large-scale structures as dominated by gravity (including its formulation in Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity).

The original form of the theory, Alfvén–Klein cosmology, was developed by Hannes Alfvén and Oskar Klein in the 1960s and 1970s, and holds that matter and antimatter exist in equal quantities at very large scales, that the universe is eternal rather than bounded in time by the Big Bang, and that the expansion of the observable universe is caused by annihilation between matter and antimatter rather than a mechanism like cosmic inflation.

Hannes Alfvén was a Swedish electrical engineer, plasma physicist and winner of the 1970 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). He described the class of MHD waves now known as Alfvén waves. He was originally trained as an electrical power engineer and later moved to research and teaching in the fields of plasma physics and electrical engineering. Alfvén made many contributions to plasma physics, including theories describing the behavior of aurorae, the Van Allen radiation belts, the effect of magnetic storms on the Earth's magnetic field, the terrestrial magnetosphere, and the dynamics of plasmas in the Milky Way galaxy.

In 1937, Alfvén argued that if plasma pervaded the universe, it could then carry electric currents capable of generating a galactic magnetic field. After winning the Nobel Prize for his works in magnetohydrodynamics, he emphasized that:

His theoretical work on field-aligned electric currents in the aurora (based on earlier work by Kristian Birkeland) was confirmed in 1967, these currents now being known as Birkeland currents.

British scientist Sydney Chapman was a strong critic of Alfvén. Many physicists regarded Alfvén as espousing unorthodox opinions.  R. H. Stuewer noting that "... he remained an embittered outsider, winning little respect from other scientists even after he received the Nobel Prize..." and was often forced to publish his papers in obscure journals. Alfvén recalled:

"When I describe [plasma phenomena] according to this formalism most referees do not understand what I say and turn down my papers. With the referee system which rules US science today, this means that my papers are rarely accepted by the leading US journals."

Alfvén waves (low frequency hydromagnetic plasma oscillations) are named in his honor and propagate at the Alfvén speed. Many of his theories about the solar system were verified as late as the 1980s through external measurements of cometary and planetary magnetospheres. However, Alfvén himself noted that astrophysical textbooks poorly represented known plasma phenomena:

Alfvén reported that of 17 of the most used textbooks on astrophysics, none mention the pinch effect, none mentioned critical ionization velocity, only two mentioned circuits, and three mentioned double layers.

Alfvén believed the problem with the Big Bang was that astrophysicists tried to extrapolate the origin of the universe from mathematical theories developed on the blackboard, rather than starting from known observable phenomena. He also considered the Big Bang to be a myth devised to explain creation.

Fast forward to the early 2000's and opposition to the Big Bang theory began to resurge due to increasing issues with the theory. By the 2020's a strong case could now be made that something is seriously wrong with the current standard model of cosmology and I've written extensively about it in The Emperor Has No Cloths. More recently, some data has come out that not only continues to disagree with the standard model, but apparently matches one of Alfvéns predictions related to antiparticles.

Nuclear Secrets

How does this all potentially spill over to nuclear secrets? Well, it turns out that your cosmological model dictates your nuclear models. A perfect example being fusion energy research. Plasma physics dominates most fusion energy research. It turns out that a cosmology that supports plasma being the most dominate principle becomes useful if plasma phenomena scales well from the micro to the astronomical, which we have observed it does for at least 14 orders of magnitude. This means you can study galactic phenomena as a way to help you understand energetic phenomena on Earth and in the lab. So, if you have a nuclear technology secret one way to limit others from discovering it independently is to encourage an incorrect and limiting cosmology within academia as well as as much brain drain within the field of plasma physics as possible. It appears that this isn't a crazy notion if you simply look into these fields. Alfven himself reported on the academic journals and textbooks ignoring key concepts and blocking publication during his time.

UFO Secrets

How does this all potentially spill over to UFO secrets? Well, it turns out that the physics of energy and propulsion is also dominated by plasma physics. The questions of inertia and gravity also change dramatically under a cosmological model where plasma physics is the dominant principle. The question of time also changes under a cosmological model where the Universe has no beginning in time. It simply always was. One of the elegant features of the Steady State theory is that because the Universe is infinitely old the question of its origin doesn’t arise. It has always existed. This then changes the Drake Equation to suggest the odds of life elsewhere is practically guaranteed. The implications of switching cosmological models are profound. It affects all advanced technologies and concepts.

Supporting Evidence

I'm going to offer supporting evidence by pointing out some very odd connections between certain people and institutions. It's admittedly circumstantial, but worth looking into. Let's look at "An Open Letter to the Scientific Community" (published in New Scientist in May 2004) that critiques the "growing number of hypothetical entities in the big bang theory". The letter states that plasma cosmology, the steady-state model and other alternative approaches can also explain the basic phenomena of the cosmos. But more importantly, look at who signed the letter and who those people are associated with. Notice these are not the resumes of pseudo scientists and many on the list are physicists involved in nuclear technology, government, military, and space technology including national labs, Nevada Test Site, DOE, BAE, and NASA just to name a few....

Content cut off. Read original on https://old.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fd2bh2/could_hiding_the_physics_of_ufos_be_related_to/

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/MR_PRESIDENT__ on 2024-09-09 22:08:21+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/TheGoodTroubleShow on 2024-09-09 22:06:37+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Kokiri78x on 2024-09-09 20:31:16+00:00.

Interview with Daniel Sheehan I don't know much but he says he was in the private conversations in the Senate, he says he met with several of those who want to continue with the monopoly of energy and power which obviously does not have to happen, that he saw the secret videos of aliens, the reactions of the senators, disclosure strategies, the whole interview was fascinating

1:33:58

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/KOOKOOOOM on 2024-09-09 21:30:23+00:00.

Original Title: Lue Elizondo: “There’s a real credible concern for the safety of [whistleblowers’] lives. I’m not being hyperbolic here. […] We’ve got to protect these people. […] These people are putting their lives on the line.”

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/InstanceOutrageous96 on 2024-09-09 19:05:24+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/PositiveSong2293 on 2024-09-09 18:31:51+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Electronic-Amount-29 on 2024-09-09 20:06:15+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Constant_Frosting_96 on 2024-09-09 18:42:47+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/DeclassifyUAP on 2024-09-09 15:55:42+00:00.

Folks, we are down to the wire.

Congress gets back to DC today from their break, which means the U.S. Senate will be finalizing their version of the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act very shortly.

They are determining what the final bill will include, via the so-called Managers’ Package of amendments.

The goal is for the Rounds-Schumer UAP Disclosure Act to be included in that Managers’ Package.

This hurdle has to be cleared, in order for the UAPDA to have a chance of being included in the final NDAA that is crafted via the reconciliation process in the Nov/Dec timeframe.

US Voters, the UAPDA needs your help! Please take a few minutes to call your two Senators’ DC offices today and this week (ASAP) and tell them:

"The Rounds-Schumer UAP Disclosure Act, SA 2610, must be included in the Senate Managers' Package of amendments for the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act, Senate bill S.4638."

Say it just like that, including the amendment and bill numbers, and make sure they make a note of it to relay to the Senator.

Let them know you're a constituent when you call, provide your name and contact info, and let them know you'd like a response from the Senator on their support for the UAPDA.

DeclassifyUAP.org/action has a call tool you can use that will help connect you to your Senators’ DC offices, or you can you the lookup tool at Congress.gov (search tool is toward the upper-right).

After that, consider making a few more calls to Senators attached to this issue who are on the committees that will be determining the final Managers’ Package of Senate FY25 NDAA amendments. UAPCaucus.com/call is your tool for that.

Finally, if you haven’t already, take a moment and add your name to the petition at uapdisclosurefund.org.

Be part of disclosure — it’s the ONLY way we’re going to push this over the finish line.

We have several years of solid legislative wins behind us, so let’s celebrate those wins and keep the pressure on to rack up some more!

Former high-level officials like H.R. McMaster would NOT be adding their names to the roster of those acknowledging the reality of highly-anomalous UAP/UFOs if it weren’t for the public’s pressure.

Thank you for all you’ve done, and let’s keep working the phones and sending messages. It’s how we do this.

And one more time: ALL focus on the Senate — RIGHT NOW! They are finalizing their version of this year’s NDAA in the coming days! The House already did this (with no UAP legislation), so the path to getting the UAPDA into the final bill requires the Senate to include it in the bill they will soon be finalizing on their side.

Disclosure is all of ours to claim!

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Shiny-Tie-126 on 2024-09-09 12:11:55+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/incarnate_devil on 2024-09-09 11:42:03+00:00.

In June 2024, the Major Cities Chiefs Association released a guide for UAP encounters.

It is an 11 page pdf

UAP In the News Section.1

Law Enforcement Considerations Section.2

U.S. Government UAP Programs Section.3

Whistleblowers Section.4

UAP and Congress Section.5

UAP and U.S. DoD Section. 6

Other U.S. Gov and Intl. Reporting Section.7

UAP and NASA Section.8

UAP and FAA Section.9

UAP Reporting Mechanisms Section. 10

Key Takeaways Section.11

Edit: fixed list format

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Mordrenix on 2024-09-09 07:53:24+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/VolarRecords on 2024-09-09 06:57:17+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/Fit-Yogurt-38 on 2024-09-09 02:54:32+00:00.

I just finished Lue’s book and believe what he claims. I notice he always talks about how there is amazing (can’t think of a better word rn lol) information out there that is fully unclassified and available for all the public to see…

Why can’t he tell us what he is referring to if it is indeed completely unclassified and available to the public? Just curious

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/ufos by /u/thenewguydownthehall on 2024-09-09 02:19:23+00:00.

I tried to post this in the UAP sub also but I think maybe it was either locked or deleted. My wife and I were sitting outside around 7:30p this evening watching the sunset and while we were watching, a huge triangular shape transparent craft or possible three crafts in perfect flying formation was moving slowly and silently southwest over Dulles airport. The lead craft or front light was a band of 6-8 very bright white lights while the rear corners of the craft or rear lights were very bright single white lights. Did anyone else see this? I’ve lived around airports my entire life I’ve and have seen countless airplanes everyday for a half century and I have never seen anything like this.