this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)

Git

2899 readers
1 users here now

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Resources

Rules

  1. Follow programming.dev rules
  2. Be excellent to each other, no hostility towards users for any reason
  3. No spam of tools/companies/advertisements. It’s OK to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

Git Logo by Jason Long is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
jnovinger@programming.dev
canpolat@programming.dev
17
How do you feel about storing binary files with Git? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 4 months ago by howrar@lemmy.ca to c/git@programming.dev
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I think it's generally agreed upon that large files that change often do not belong while small files that never change are fine. But there's still a lot of middle ground where the answer is not so clear to me.

So what's your stance on this? Where do you draw the line?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

Git is all about tracking changes over time which is meaningless with binary files.

Utter codswallop. You can see the changes to a PNG over time. Lots of different UIs will even show you diffs for images.

Git can track changes to binary files perfectly well. It might not be great at dealing with conflicts in them but that's another matter.

The only issue is that binary files tend to be large, and often don't compress very well with Git's delta compression. It's large files that are the issue, not binary files. If you have a 20 kB binary file it's going to be absolutely fine in Git. Likewise a 10 GB CSV file is not going to be such a good idea.