864
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 309 points 2 years ago

Man, I'm so happy with the way this is going so far. I sure hope she wins the election.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 78 points 2 years ago

I hope Republicans get absolutely crushed to the point that it becomes clear catering to the extremists and conspiracy theorists is not tenable. Then they have 4 years to try to rebuild from the ashes and try to present a reasonable platform instead of something insane.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

For sure, though I said the same thing in 2020 and was disappointed at how close it was. Really a terrible reflection on the country.

[-] itsgoodtobeawake@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I hope they are crushed, learn nothing and double down on it by running with Trump again, this time fully campaigning from prison.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

Looking forward to 82 year old trump vs Harris 2028

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Followed by 86 year old Trump vs, I dunno, Kelly maybe?

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Let the Tories in the UK be a terrible warning for them.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Let the American voters follow the example of the UK's voters this year!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago

Agreed, and wow, you can really sense the working cognitive function, I have to admit. Especially when only one of the candidates has it now.

load more comments (31 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
864 points (97.2% liked)

politics

31022 readers
1247 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS