this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
364 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2275 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Air New Zealand has abandoned a 2030 goal to cut its carbon emissions, blaming difficulties securing more efficient planes and sustainable jet fuel.

The move makes it the first major carrier to back away from such a climate target.

The airline added it is working on a new short-term target and it remains committed to an industry-wide goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050.

The aviation industry is estimated to produce around 2% of global carbon dioxide emissions, which airlines have been trying to reduce with measures including replacing older aircraft and using fuel from renewable sources.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

For these goals to be reachable, I think it comes down new tech. I don't think people are going to stop flying. For many it's simply not an option, especially if you have family far away.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a choice people are making, moving from one side of the US to the other to go to school or for work is a choice, it's not normal in our current situation that we accept that and just think it's ok that these people travel across a continent multiple times a year. Same for people traveling halfway across the world for vacations, in the current state of things that's unacceptable. Humans have never had that much mobility in their history as they've had in the last 100 years, it doesn't mean it's a good thing for the world and it doesn't mean it's sustainable and should stay this way.

We need to stop relying on tech to come and save us, we have the power to do something right now.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

It's not always a choice. Only for the privileged.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Standard denier response. We don't need to do anything cos magic future tech will save us

[–] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

"New tech"

Old tech, actually. From the 60s. It's called high speed rail.