this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
404 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2713 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foxymulder@lemmy.ml 75 points 3 months ago (4 children)

doesnt japan have a near 100% conviction rate too? they dont prosecute offences if theres a chance of not winning?

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 65 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not 100% but it's super high and, yeah, they usually don't prosecute unless they think they have a really solid case. That said, some of that also includes confessions that some have argued are under duress (and, in the case of foreigners, people who aren't exactly sure what they're signing, though I have no idea how that's legal).

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They also can hold suspects in detention without trial or hearing for months while they investigate, if they choose. It's not often discussed but it's a huge part of the pressure/duress.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is not correct. It's 20ish days (23, I think?)

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This may have changed since I learned about it in 2008, but my understanding is that they get around that rule by technically "releasing" you and "rearresting" you on suspicion of related crimes. The "rearrests" can stack.

[–] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 0 points 3 months ago

I think it has to be another crime, but that probably still can be done. I'm not a lawyer so I'm not sure, and I hope I never have occasion to find out.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

i mean "don't prosecute until they have a solid case" is one way of looking at it, the other is "the courts always side with the police"

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 18 points 3 months ago

Not sure what sort of sentence he's looking at here though.

The guy who actually boarded the ship and tried to assault the captain only got a suspended sentence. And this guy is being tried as an accomplice for that.

It doesn't sound terribly serious, tbh.