this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
297 points (94.9% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

1434 readers
361 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think it's just the loss of knowledge. It would be like if somehow Wikipedia broke today or something with zero backups.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. By definition it's not a primary source of information. Anything on Wikipedia ~~comes~~ should come from a trustworthy primary source. So technically there should be zero loss of knowledge if Wikipedia is lost. Just access would be harder (but still overall easier than it was for an average person to gain access to the library of Alexandria).

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're right, it's probably not a great example. I don't know what a modern equivalent of it might be. The internet as a whole?

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago