Technology

59657 readers

2949 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

2232

Study Finds Consumers Are Actively Turned Off by Products That Use AI (futurism.com)

submitted 3 months ago by morrowind@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

388 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What are these code generators that have existed for a long time?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lookup emmet.

I’ve also found IntelliJ’s generators useful for Java.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Neither of those seem similar to GitHub copilot other than that they can reduce keystrokes for some common tasks. The actual applicability of them seems narrow. Frequently I use GitHub copilot for “implement this function based on this doc comment I wrote” or “write docs for this class/function”. It’s the natural language component that makes the LLM approach useful.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

There is also auto doc generators.

I think what you’re specifically referring to is accessibility or ease of use. For someone unfamiliar with those tools, I can see the appeal.

Personally, as a software dev, I think it’s just very inefficient way to accomplish this goal. LLMs consume vastly more resources than a simple script. So I wouldn’t use it, especially if I’m paying real money for it.