this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
447 points (85.5% liked)

Antiwork

483 readers
8 users here now

For the abolition of work. Yes really, abolish work! Not "reform work" but the destruction of work as a separate field of human activity.

To save the world, we're going to have to stop working! — David Graeber

A strange delusion possesses the working classes of the nations where capitalist civilization holds its sway. ...the love of work... Instead of opposing this mental aberration, the priests, the economists, and the moralists have cast a sacred halo over work. — Paul Lafargue

In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic. — Karl Marx

In the glorification of 'work', in the unwearied talk of the 'blessing of work', I see the same covert idea as in the praise of useful impersonal actions: that of fear of everything individual. — Friedrich Nietzsche

If hard work were such a wonderful thing, surely the rich would have kept it all to themselves. — Lane Kirkland

The bottom line is simple: all of us deserve to make the most of our potential as we see fit, to be the masters of our own destinies. Being forced to sell these things away to survive is tragic and humiliating. We don’t have to live like this. ― CrimethInc

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 65 points 2 months ago (3 children)

this has severe conservative energy. the fuck is this even supposed to mean? if you're paid for it, it's a job, dumbass. that's literally the only metric.

[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I feel like this post is kind of weirdly shitty/gate keeping in its own way

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But what does it even gate keep against...?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are lots of things you wouldn’t see in a children’s book

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A human pet is a bit different than an animal pet

Also not a pig

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your statement prior to my link was that "There are lots of things you wouldn’t see in a children’s book" which I have sufficiently defeated quite handily. Since you seem unsatisfied, how about this:

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t say having a pet bunny is bad, even if it is gay

As for a serial killer thriller book. I don’t think it’s intended for children there have been adult comic books before

I think you are intentionally lying to be contrarian

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

Lmfao

This dude can parse images but holds converation worse than AI.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well at least this is a more specific take and, apart from duct tapers, seems roughly sensible in what it's trying to say, if i understood correctly from my cursory glance, that jobs should be more fulfilling than making the elite feel better.

but the tweet is doing a very bad job if this is really what they're alluding to. the tweet's framing is more similar to reactionary rhetoric against sex work, entertainment and art, clean jobs, and basically anything that's not coal mining.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

reactionary rhetoric against sex work

Oh, I can definitely see an animal doing sex work in a... Not-children's book. I think that's the whole idea behind furries.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 2 months ago

It's the "children's book" bit that's the important bit though. Basically he's advocating for a child's view of the world, where a job requires hitting things with a hammer.

The irony of course been that the artist who drew that book, presumably wouldn't be considered to have a worthwhile job by this philosophy.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 2 months ago

I think it's trying to say that intellectual jobs are not jobs. Which is demonstrably not true.

If all the investment bankers went away we'd probably be fine but if all the cyber security experts went away there'd be a big problem. The job is labour intensive, but one of them is much less important than the other.