this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
1526 points (99.0% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1597 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Mozilla is about to collapse due to the Google antitrust ruling though.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

Mozilla and its murder/suicide pact with Google falling apart may be the best thing that could possibly happen to Firefox.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Um, what makes you think that?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla makes about $590m a year.

$510m of that is from Google paying for the search engine default spot.

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well I for one hope they figure out an alternative income, like a premium subscription? Or perhaps look to get acquired by proton and get some integration going with those services? I'm no expert here, I just think that they have a lot of happy users, and there must be some way to figure this out financially.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They need to reform as a non-profit with user membership, an elected board, and fundraising like Wikipedia.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

I'm not aware of any non-profit with staffing the size of Mozilla. The problem is that you need to be able to make money and to set it aside for bad times, so you don't have to fire employees the moment the donations falter.

The 501(c)(3) non-profit form of tax-exempt non-profit, which is what the Mozilla Foundation continues to be, is not allowed to do so. That's why they opened up the for-profit Mozilla Corporation subsidiary that does most of the Firefox development.

On the plus side, the only shareholder of the Mozilla Corporation is the Mozilla Foundation, which therefore essentially cannot accept any of the profit the MoCo might make.

[–] hanke@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago

This is the real answer

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's a ridiulously low amount of money given the amount of users. I'd happily pay 10-20 bucks a year to keep mozilla alive. Not that I like it much, but more so than the big alternatives

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, Apple seems to be able to fetch a little more than a billion per percent of the browser market (18% at 20B), but Mozilla is only able to score 0.5B for 2-3% of the market. Mozilla is getting a quarter of Apple’s rate.

That said, Apple has a lot more leverage than Google, and they can strong arm a better deal. I also wouldn’t be surprised if Safari users are just a more valuable marketing cohort. Firefox’s user base is going to have a lot more people who opt out of and or block targeted marketing.

[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The Google antitrust decision will result in Mozilla losing 90% of their revenue since Google won't be allowed to pay them to use their search engine anymore.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The antitrust case is about Google and Apple, not Mozilla. It doesn't mean the antitrust case will have any impact on Mozilla, because it's not a major player, unlike Apple.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago

I don't think you realize where and why Mozilla gets its funding.