this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
208 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2539 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Berlin court has convicted a pro-Palestinian activist of condoning a crime for leading a chant of the slogan “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” at a rally in the German capital four days after the Hamas attacks on Israel, in what her defence team called a defeat for free speech.

The presiding judge, Birgit Balzer, ordered 22-year-old German-Iranian national Ava Moayeri to pay a €600 (£515) fine on Tuesday, rejecting her argument that she meant only to express support for “peace and justice” in the Middle East by calling out the phrase on a busy street.

Balzer said she “could not comprehend” the logic of previous German court rulings that determined the saying was “ambiguous”, saying to her it was clear it “denied the right of the state of Israel to exist”.

MBFC
Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“reducing Jews to Israel is literally anti-semitic” (which I fully agree with, by the way) making Sholz anti-semitic,

Where did he say anything like that? In fact, he implied the exact opposite:

He calls Jewish life in Germany “a gift” and pledges to protect Jewish institutions in Germany.”

German Jews, of course, not being Israeli Jews so Israel and Jews can't be one and the same thing.

He stresses German and Israeli commitment to democracy, rights and laws, and says Germany “is not indifferent to the humanitarian situation in Gaza” and that he and Netanyahu discussed “improving” the humanitarian situation in Gaza.

Does that sound like parroting the likes of Ben-Gvir to you? You know, an actual unabashed racist? Is he talking about the seed of Amalek or stuff, directly, indirectly, whatever?

I already told you about the nuance to Germany's position. I'm not going to repeat myself. You, OTOH, seem to want to rant on and on.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Now you're just selectively quoting and ignoring the repeated mentioning by Sholz of Israel as the Jewish State (not a Jewish State) and dissembling by claiming that talking about Jews that live in Germany means he can't possibly be conflating Israel with Jews; putting up strawmen (please provide a quote of were I claimed german politiocians were unabashedly racist) and making the point that racism can only ever be of the kind as extreme as Ben-Gvir.

No wonder you think that the kind of politicians that opposed the bringing of an ICC case against Israel for Genocide (so against merely bringing the case, a case which Israel would win if they were not guilty) are being "nuanced".

In your, very special, not in the dictionary, definition of the word, "racism" can only be the loud raging ethni-cleansing-demanding kind of the likes of Ben-Gvir (who not long ago was a member of the Israeli government, a government which still includes other people who say the very same kind of thing as he does) and never the soft-spoken kind which provides diplomatic cover for ethno-Fascists committing Genocide along ethnic lines.

By your very special definitions of "racism" and "nuanced", the people who morally supported the KKK and even gave them weapons but did not openly participated in their lynchings are "nuanced" and "not racist".

I really hope Germany does the right thing eventually (though one wonders how many more tens of thousands of children will have to be murderer by the Zionists before Germany explicitly states that "Germany does not support the current Israeli Government and its actions in Gaza") and it's good news that the weapons shipments have been suspended (something I was unaware of). That said, it will have to actually happen to be believed, and things like Germany legally linking words supporting a Free Palestine with anti-semitism and punishing people for saying them casts doubt on there being a true will inside the German Institutions to do so.

Even if Germany does end up doing the right thing, the shame of having continued to provide moral and diplomatic support to the Zionists even after they murdered tens of thousands of children, will still remain with Germany.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Now you’re just selectively quoting and ignoring the repeated mentioning by Sholz of Israel as the Jewish State

I suggest you learn English, then. Compare:

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz says in Tel Aviv that Berlin will always stand beside the Jewish state, citing its responsibility following the Holocaust.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz says in Namibia's capital Windhoek that Berlin will always stand beside the African state, citing its responsibility following the Herero-Nama genocide.

How many African states are there? Also, that's not even a literal quote who knows what Scholz actually said. Also why do you keep misspelling his name, don't you care about accuracy?