this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
417 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59549 readers
3350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jasonw911@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Three mile island did not have a meltdown, ffs. Not even close.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Three mile island did not have a meltdown, ffs. Not even close.

"The Three Mile Island accident was a partial nuclear meltdown"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident

[–] Jasonw911@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are technically correct, and that is the best kind of correct. I spoke from frustration, having grown up there. What i should have said was that there was no danger to the public, it was fully contained behind multiple redundant safety containments. Its frustrating because i feel like that incident stalled nuclear energy in this country since then.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 3 months ago

I wouldn't say no danger, but the danger was averted. It did even release radioactive material, but not enough to be dangerous.

It could have gone much worse, but it didn't.