this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
654 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39184 readers
1937 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Business Insider* yahoo is acting as an aggregator

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok, but the output of the aggregator can still be analyzed for bias, right? How often does "Business Insider* yahoo" aggregate right-wing bullshit vs left-wing bullshit vs actual apolitical truth? Knowing the source's source doesn't change the veracity of the article, only the contents of the article affect that.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

So you're upset that this little bot is correctly configured to ignore a link aggregate site because the bot doesn't yet have nested links implemented?

I guess b better argument is, why have the bot post a comment at all. Or maybe it's the Media Bias api that's just giving back a negative and the bot doesn't know it's due to the source being a link aggregate.