1026
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It's not overlooked it's simply not economical. If you want an energy transition towards sustainability, renewables are the way to go.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is it. Nuclear is horrendously expensive to commission and decommission. Onshore wind is the cheapest energy there is, and solar isn't expensive either. But the fossil fuel industry can't stand the price comparison nor the reduction in demand/scarcity, so in corporate run America, it doesn't happen at scale unless some politicians who actually want to make things better get real power.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1026 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

4230 readers
245 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules:

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

No NYPost, Breitbart, Daily Mail, Daily Wire

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS