this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
654 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39184 readers
2138 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that if we do whatever it takes to avoid "pushing" Putin into using nukes, then in effect we're saying he can do whatever he wants because he has nukes.

Given that Russia literally sees accelerating climate change as advantageous to them, an unchecked Russian Federation might actually do more damage to life on earth than nuclear war would, over a long enough timeline.

The only rational play is to treat his threats as hollow, because time and time again he's proven that they are. Otherwise we're basically just handing Putin an "I do what I want" card.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Actual nuclear war or climate change really only damage the things currently living. Life will always succeed in some form, even if we don't. I understand where you're coming from tho

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm really not sure where you think I said "End life on Earth", "Destroy the planet" or any of the other possible phrasings you seem to be trying to react to.

I feel like you had this response in the chamber ready to go, saw the words "climate change" and immediately skipped reading everything else.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

"Do more damage to life on earth than actual nuclear war would"

That's a quote from your comment that I replied to. I think both would be equally disastrous for the life that currently lives here as true MAD would wipe out humanity and most animals and greatly alter living conditions, similar to how climate change will.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Nuclear war’s effect on the biosphere would be orders of magnitude worse than the effects of climate change.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Doubling down on your own misunderstanding doesn't make it any less of a misunderstanding.