this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
79 points (88.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27049 readers
1879 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm pretty sure they would. It's not like they'd like to see their seaside properties go underwater within their lifetimes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kenkenken@fedia.io 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so. Climate change is not a big threat for the rich. Actually they can even gain benefits from it, as it will push inequality to new heights.

[–] mindlesscrollyparrot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't think the billionaires' investments are going to be worth billions if the global economy collapses.

[–] kenkenken@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago

I think relative values mean more than absolute for them. They just need to keep their position as the richest people in the world even in absolute sense they will lose. Money itself expresses relative values. So billionaires will continue be billionaires.

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

We hoi polloi think in money numbers and what we can afford to purchase. For the Capital Class, it's all about power. Money is just how they keep score.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Billionaires don't care about the economy. What matters is whom owns the means of production. And in today's age, whom owns the means of ideology production.

Being g a saint to a group of bullies is worth everything.