this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
684 points (78.1% liked)

World News

39127 readers
2872 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m killing half as many creatures for my transient pleasure as I was last year.

Oh, why not just stop murdering entirely?

HOW DARE YOU TRY TO SHOVE YOUR BELIEFS DOWN MY THROAT

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’m killing half as many creatures for my transient pleasure as I was last year.

Oh, why not just stop murdering entirely?

Sorry, it does not work that way. Each way of doing agriculture kills creatures. There are insects, rodents, snails and birds harmed in any landscaping operation, wether the end product is meat or plant.

All you can do by changing your diet from meat to plant is a gradual change. You kill less and do less harm, which is great. But you still kill and do harm, that's just how these things are.

Maybe a kill-free diet is possible with food synthesized in sterile labs, but the resources for that also have to come from somewhere.

[–] Thadrax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

All you can do by changing your diet from meat to plant is a gradual change. You kill less and do less harm, which is great. But you still kill and do harm, that’s just how these things are.

True. The difference is between calling it good enough halfway or going as far as possible though. So they do have a point, although I agree that (like in every other group of people) there are some that are a little over enthusiastic and in danger or turning people away instead of encouraging them.

[–] BlackRose@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, and that's a great reason for a plant based diet.

But read again to what I replied:

I’m killing half as many creatures for my transient pleasure as I was last year.

Oh, why not just stop murdering entirely?

There seems to exist the delusion of kill-free agriculture, when the best we can achieve is to kill less.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We know that we have a Impact on others but shouldn't the goal be to keep it a minimum?

Animal industry is the intentional killing and abusing of animals. Animal feed is the biggest part of crops grown, for those crops all kind of animals are killed on a big scale. Veganism is about reducing the impact, stopping the intentional killing and reducing the unavoidable impact as much as possible. There is no delusion of a "zero impact vegan" it is just a construct for people who want to justify not changing them self.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We know that we have a Impact on others but shouldn’t the goal be to keep it a minimum?

Yes, completely agreed.

There is no delusion of a “zero impact vegan”

Maybe I misunderstood the person I was initially responding to, but I understood them as exactly that, when they said what I already quoted two times.

It's also not the first time I encountered this attitude. Maybe they don't actually believe what they say, but then my critique is directed at the wording. There is no zero kill diet (although plant based diets are clearly much less harmful than other diets).

Occasionally, some vegans bring up this idea and react very sensitive when confronted with how it's false. Maybe that defensiveness is fueled by cognitive dissonance which we mostly know from the other side.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is no zero kill diet

Occasionally, some vegans bring up this idea and react very sensitive when confronted with how it’s false.

Maybe they have a hard time to explain the difference between intentional raising, raping and killing versus the death of critters, which meat carries many times more because feed production uses more plants than eating plants directly. But unless you are a monk and care about every step you take and grow your own no impact is delusional. Everything we use has a impact, every metal, every plastic end every car drive. But we can stop the intentional killing. Maybe a "zero murder" philosophy and not a "zero deaths" way.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the difference between intentional raising, raping and killing versus the death of critters, which meat carries many times more because feed production uses more plants than eating plants directly. But unless you are a monk and care about every step you take and grow your own no impact is delusional. Everything we use has a impact, every metal, every plastic end every car drive.

Yes.

But we can stop the intentional killing.

Can we? I mean, agriculture is intentional. The land use alone causes killing or even worse, habitat loss. Yes, vastly more if used for milk or cheese, but I consider this point settled by now.

Maybe a “zero murder” philosophy and not a “zero deaths” way.

I'm afraid the only honest option is to not summon "zero". Every diet causes death and suffering, but the amount can vary a lot. Also animals considered pests are killed intentionally.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we? I mean, agriculture is intentional

That is like saying the intention of driving is killing kids on the street because it happens. Is the intention of wearing cloth to slave others? Is the intention of buying meat to kill children?

Animal industry is paying for murder and abuse, there is no way about it. It is what you pay for. That is the deal, your money their lives.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is like saying the intention of driving is killing kids on the street because it happens.

I feel misrepresented. The harm caused by road construction and driving is not intended, but accepted. It's part of the whole package, which is the part which is intended.

Animal industry is paying for murder and abuse

I feel we're running in circles. I thought that part was settled, while it was never disputed in the first place. Let's stop here.

[–] Vegoon@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I feel misrepresented. The harm caused by road construction and driving is not intended, but accepted. It’s part of the whole package, which is the part which is intended.

Do you think we could say the same if kill a worm by tiling the soil for plants? as not intended but accepted? That is the hole point, it is accepted side effect. But the killing of a cow is the main goal in the animal industry, not a side effect.

[–] infamousta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

With 50% less meat consumed, less plants need to be harvested, so less insects, rodents, snails, birds would die.

Also which is easier to sell to someone currently eating meat with every meal?