this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
728 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59657 readers
2688 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've provided plenty of evidence, and there is more to be found if you feel like you need it. Do you really expect me to provide an exhausting dissertation on every single detail of the situation? I provided just enough to back up my claims. If you feel you need more, that's on you and it's available for you to find. That does not warrant your baseless accusations.

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, because I copied my messages from before explaining the situation in an attempt to educate people about the toxic behavior of the website owner? Should I have wrote a whole new comment instead? Should I just keep quiet and let toxic people not reap the consequences of their actions?

Okay, bud.

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Each time burying the lead that the mod abuse was against you.

I didn't even know who you were until I realized the username in the screenshot matched.

Have you ever heard that there's 3 sides to every story? I've seen yours. I think it's a whole lotta nothing.

Your inability to let it go after months.. It all tells me everything I need to know about why this means so much to you, and why you're still doing this.

Educator...okay.

This keeps you up at night.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol your argument is that the mod abuse is somehow okay because it wasn't against someone else?

Why should any amount of mod abuse be okay, forgotten, or 'let go'?

You've spent way too much time arguing a shitty position that really has no effect on you. Then you say I need to ' let it go'?

The irony is too sad to be funny. I feel sorry for you.

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My argument is that you first appear to be a nuetral reporter when, in reality, you are a biased participant.

Also... This is night 1 of me thinking about this.

There won't be a night 2.

This is night 80 for you.

Don't project.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So, the facts are somehow not facts because of the source they came from?

You're insane.

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. The facts are not facts because they're opinions. You present your "facts" through the lens of a neutral party, and you are clearly anything but neutral.

You make a claim hoping to get the hivemind on your side. You dump screenshots showing your embarrassing behavior and count on the fact that 60+ people won't even stop to verify or form their own opinion.

The sad part is that you're right. You can say anything and if it aligns with their preconceived narrative, they'll upvote and keep scrolling.

Which is exactly why you bury the lead, because if you said outright from the beginning that it was against you, well then people would be alerted to your inherent bias and actually form their own opinions.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The facts are presented as neutral because they exist and are neutral.

The moderator deleted messages to hide their negative response, including messages that broke no rules citing a non-existent rule for the reason. They found out that the mod logs are public after they were called out for misusing their moderator powers by deleting messages that broke no rules. Then immediately deleted their account and complained about it on mastodon, very clearly stating that their issue was that mod logs are public.

If you think that those facts somehow change because of the context, then that's on you. You're just flat wrong.

Also it's "bury the lede" 🙂

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_paragraph#Spelling

lol

You just can't help being pedantic. They're both correct.

The moderator got tired of this platform because it enables people who feel they were slighted to critique their every move. Mod logs don't have to be public. I think it's fine to disagree with that as a moderator. Mod abuse has been caught for decades without it, none of your argument hinged on the public mod logs other than the mastadon post where he shared annoyance that you were bothering him with them. Moderators are free to moderate with the tools and platform they want. He resigned, so fucking what.

He was snarky back at you. Big whoop.

This is an insular 1st world problem you are experiencing. Stemming from a bruised ego. This guy is not manipulative or toxic. You're overreacting.

Looking through your comments you do plenty of "dishing it out". But this is how you react when someone sarcastically replies to you then nukes the thread? You must have paper skin.