this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
943 points (96.5% liked)

News

23397 readers
3557 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 123 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm a union worker and I'm dismayed at the amount of my union brothers who vote for pieces of shit like this. Who buy into their bullshit and actually think that conservatives will help them. Talk about voting against your own interests. If you're in a union, voting for conservatives is just stupid

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Union worker myself. I am also baffled by the strong conservative undercurrent in my fellows' views. Don't know how they sustain it.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bigotry, selfishness, severe lack of intelligence and or basic reasoning skills. I can keep going.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

A big part of it is the view that the left "gives money away". Union jobs are typically labor with long hous and their view is that "I work hard for the money I eared and my taxes go to the lazy".

I think that's bullshit obviously, but that is a pretty common sentiment from my experience.

[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now that you say that, yeah, I do hear that kinda shit from my older and, ironically, youngest coworkers. I've given up arguing with them.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 15 points 2 months ago

Please keep arguing with them

If Trump wins i will need to flee the country for my family’s safety. And i would rather not.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It's a really hard mindset to break because at it's surface it make sense. Especially when you focus on fringe cases.

Like I am sure there are people who abuse the system, but it's not a good life, they don't make that much off of it. No one is living large off welfare. The "welfare queen" stereotype had been by and large disproven, but has left a lasting effect on people's opinion.

Personally I rather have a few $ slip through and make sure kids arn't starving.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They work long hours but also live in a society. So do they not like roads to drive on? Or having a military? Or public schools? Or libraries? You know. Stuff that benefits them?

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Not the part they are upset with. This particular example it's with welfare. Seeing it as people getting money for not working.

A lot of people also don't understand the benefits taxes provide as you described but not what I am talking about.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You give them way too much credit. They look for negativity and outrage and persecution in everything, not reason and investment and public benefit. To them the biggest danger to the American economy is liberals taking the money from the working folk and giving it to the welfare queens to cover their Lexus leases or whatever.

What’s that you say? The government is taking the middle class’s money to subsidize wealthy people not paying taxes? Why are you so JeaLoUS? Why do you want to PuNiSh SuCcEsS rather than rewarding it, comrade? Now stop trying to give free food to growing children who didn’t earn it you monster!

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's another reason US tax system baffles me. Why does it make it so that workers have to pay taxes this way. In my country, salary have very small tax and it's cut before the money comes into your account at all. So whatever money you egt is yours, there is no feeling of paying taxes at all. While employers will pay taxes and the taxes on profit is a lot more than tax on salary.

I personally think there's not much point of tax on the salary, they'll be spending it on other things, and whoever makes profit on that will pay the taxes on their profit. e.g. you get salary no tax, you buy clothes, vehicle, prepared food, etc. and those companies get your money, and they pay tax on profit, and then have expenses which is money that goes to other companies/people who again pay tax on profit, and their expenses goes somewhere else. All in the money is only taxed once, when there is profit. Unlike in every transaction.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I have been thinking about this as well. I am sure there is some probelm with a spending side tax rather than income. Probably subversion of the tax. Undertable deals, street vendors, etc. With income they make the company track and get their cut before you are able to subvert anything.

Also our economy is very credit based with the use of credit cards. If taxes were all collected at point of sale there might be probelms with defaulting and who gets the money if people don't pay.

I am not an economist. I am sure someone has thought of it already.

[–] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If I may propose a counterpoint: all that, in some cases, sure, but certainly also other cases where they started out under the umbrella of the right's airtight propaganda screen and simply never bothered to get a second opinion, reinforced by the cult-like indoctrination claiming that everybody else is lying anyway.

Propaganda works and it takes an active effort, an effort that is severely discouraged by the existing propaganda environment, to seek out a reality check.

However, while such cases may exist, it is getting harder and harder as time goes on to justify sticking to the FOX propaganda bubble at this point.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You are completely right. There's an entire ecosystem of right wing propaganda channels out there but most people get their news from their friends. It's the key phenomenon behind influencer culture. And that's how most of the damage is done.

If someone has one friend who is considered knowledgeable on current affairs and that one friend watches Fox, chances are that none of his associates will have an accurate understanding of any given topic. And that's by design. The kind of tripe spread on fox news is inflammatory and salacious. The sort of noxious trash you'd share with friends in private conversation.

I realize this is what TikTok and facebook maximize: The friend effect. People learn from their friends. The kind of lies spread by right wing networks is magnified by social media and Russian bot farms.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 32 points 2 months ago

Stupidity combined "fuck you, I've got mine."

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (2 children)

God, imagine if Biden had backed the railroad unions... Ahh, what might have been.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The stupidity of that decision still amazes me to this day. "Railroad safety and efficacy during the shipping crisis? No! Let the monopolistic railroads regulate themselves, fuck their workers!"

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

Canada's gov't just did the same thing last week. I swear to god if any one of them sends out Labour Day emails or tweets they'll be roasted within an inch of their political lives.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He did. After blocking the strikes his administration stepped in to negotiate for the unions and got them most of what they wanted.

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess I meant fully backed? I'm referring to the thing Biden didn't do when he had the chance, to prove how pro-union he is.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m referring to the thing Biden didn’t do when he had the chance

What thing?

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Thing that he didn't do was fully back the union in the way that I meant. No schedule changes, no predictability, no sick days. No alarm at what is apparently a nationally vital resource being run poorly by people whose sole motivation is shareholder profits.

The concessions they got were paltry in comparison and it's honestly fucking shameful that we treat people this way.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’m dismayed at the amount of my union brothers who vote for pieces of shit like this.

There was a period in the 90s when Democrats took the DLC Neoliberal turn, basically abandoned the labor movement, and made it very easy for Republicans to run as White Nationalist labor-ish sounding candidates.

But ten years ago, you'd get some Joe the Plumber asshole whining about how he can't afford to drive to work because gasoline taxes are too expensive.

Now you've got this Yaley prick telling Boston Firefighters they are the Sad Virgins rather than the Woke Chads, because they don't hate migrants enough.

Karl Rove is rolling in his pile of rent boys right now.

[–] Rageof10Suns@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Reading this was like eating an onion.