368
submitted 2 years ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 84 points 2 years ago

When they realize he is done, there will be a battle for the position of his successor, so don't put your hopes up.

[-] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

They've spent 80 years looking for a successor to Hitler and never found one.

Sometimes building a cult around an individual doesn't work out long term for a movement.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

I don't know, I think they got pretty close. Trump standing out there in front saying you'll never have to vote again... Even now it's not a sure thing and he's not going to make it in.

Hitler wasn't this magical evil mastermind that just appeared in a vacuum. The fascists were huge party of people that helped him rise to power.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

I don't think that GOP will get the same treatment as post-war NSDAP...

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They looked for one, spent 4 years, didn't find one. He lost back to back popular votes. If they thought they had someone more popular, they would have used them.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

Ya, there's no successor.
Trump is a one-off, and his popularity and spellbinding cult effect on 50% of Americans will baffle intelligentsia for millennia.

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 21 points 2 years ago

Remember when it seemed like DeSantis might be the successor? His charisma deficit plus his attacking the Weird 34 Idol were just two of Gone Ron's problems. Sleepy DonOLD is a special kind of narcissistic weirdness that's nigh impossible to duplicate.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I saw some premature Desantis president yard signs years ago. That was a glimpse into a different but also bleak future.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As others said, Hitler wasn't a mastermind. There was a large percent of the population behind him. Another Trump is a maximum of 20 years away. Probably sooner because almost half the US population is behind Trump despite being anti military, a felon, and a rapist. The next demogogue is unlikely to be as overtly criminal.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I still think some investigative journalists should look into the NLP connection when it comes to donOLD.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They don’t care about the popular vote. But the Republican Party does care that they’ve been consistently losing national elections/referendums/etc. since 2016. Even their slim majority in the house was almost worse than just staying the out party.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

There was already a battle for the position of his successor during the GOP primaries this year. Everyone lost.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Trump won. One day he will lose and that is when these others will crawl out of the shadow again. How would you like "Musk 2028"? :D

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Thankfully impossible. Musk is foreign-born and therefore ineligible unless the constitution is amended and that bar is too high even though the GOP controls most state governments (they need 2/3rds). The GOP played with this idea back when The Governator was polling very well but even then it never passed the trial balloon phase.

[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Thankfully impossible. Musk is foreign-born

Oh didn't realize that, so that's one less headache, because he would be exactly the kind of narcissist who would try that

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
368 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31076 readers
2419 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS