122
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] earosner@lemm.ee 9 points 3 years ago

I think this lines up with the primary schedule so that should make this an interesting affair.

[-] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago

All the better to claim the DOJ is interfering with elections. Ug. I just threw up a little in my mouth.

[-] Djtecha@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago

That was out of the bottle since 2016

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago

Kinda right smack-dab in the middle. Perfect set up to allow a convicted felon to be a major party nominee

[-] LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

The primary will almost certainly be de facto decided by the end of March. There's a good chance it will be de facto over by mid February, if any candidate dominates the early states.

Of the 2467 delegates up, 1250 of them will have been distributed by March 12. Republicans rules on delegate distribution heavily favor the candidate in the lead as well. No primaries/caucuses have been scheduled yet after March 12, but expect the bulk of the remainder to be in the other half of March and all of April.

The primary is all but certain to be over by May 2024.

[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago

And I'm sure they're all banking on Trump to win so they can pull the "you can't run a major court trial with a presidential nominee as the defendant" card.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 0 points 3 years ago

Trump could clench the nomination in March, then get disqualified from running in May. The GOP will have to slap together a quick Desantis, Pence, or Cruz campaign with zero cash, while Trump fights the disqualification in the appellate courts.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 8 points 3 years ago

How would he be disqualified? A candidate could run a campaign from prison if he or she wanted to.

[-] ozamataz@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago

An interesting thought, and completely unrelated to the May trial, but it's possible that the upcoming J6 indictment could include certain conspiracy charges that would prohibit holding office if convicted. I think the timing of that trial will be more important.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago

Possible but unlikely. I really hope so though or why do we even have the laws?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

Oh no, won’t anyone think of the poor fasc-err… republicans!

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago

It's worse: If Trump is the nominee you just know he's going to spend all the campaign dollars on lawyers for his various trials. He'll do his usual tour of the states doing his rallies but exactly zero dollars will make their way to downstream candidates. He's going to cost them the presidency, the house, and the senate.

At least I hope so.

He wouldn’t be disqualified from running. He can run from prison if he wanted to. (Barf)

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
122 points (95.5% liked)

politics

31511 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS