this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
837 points (100.0% liked)

196

16552 readers
1667 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

No, opening residential to commercial property would ruin it. One business won't...the droves of others will.

[–] ichmagrum@feddit.de 87 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Businesses don't usually just completely overrun entire neighborhoods, and "opening" doesn't mean "do whatever the fuck you want". You can still specify that you don't want night clubs or auto shops in a specific place.

Mixed zoning is the norm in Europe, and it sure as fuck doesn't ruin any neighborhoods, quite the opposite in fact.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Canada too. I lived on top of a tattoo and vape store across the street from a cafe and grocery store. There were rules to keep the face of the buildings looking kept up.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

I was struggling to understand this thread as a European running my business from my home, in my case I'm more of a "go visit" than "receive visits" but I also know of others in the neighborhood that do hairdressing, electronics repairs, etc.

I also have multiple supermarkets in walking distance...

[–] LucyLastic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

In Spain some people play an uno-reverse and live in industrial zones. There's also restaurants in industrial parks.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny, because mixed use zoning is some of the most desirable places to live in terms of market value. People don't want to drive for. Every. Single. Thing.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

The argument against mixed use is often that they don't want to be forced to live in a mixed use area, but the same people are fine with forcing everyone to live how they want. Most likely they only want single family homes because they have never experienced good mixed use and can't imagine how great it is.

[–] drktrts@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it’s as if you think the alternative is businesses being like “alright boys, suburbs are on the menu”.

of course there’ll be regulation, mixed use zoning doesn’t mean chaos.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Mmmmregulation paidforbysaidcompanies

[–] nueonetwo@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

That's not how cities work.

Home based businesses are normal in Canada where I live, people have hair, massage, other aesthetic studios, small scale businesses, professional services like counselling, etc. Heck, you can even rezone some corner properties to a neighbourhood commercial zone that only permits a handful of uses like corner stores or coffee shops.

The less homogenous a neighbourhood is the better it is for everyone. Unless you like being a slave to your car and driving 15 minutes to the store when you forgot milk.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago

I see you've never lived and worked in a pleasant walkable community

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "others"?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Other businesses

[–] rumckle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That's why you set limits and have laws/zoning that allow some things and not others. It doesn't have to be all or nothing.

[–] LambdaDuck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

no, it won’t. where did you get that idea from?

[–] Onionizer@geddit.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely ruined, dreadful and downright hostile these mixed streets

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

mixed

See, that's where you trigger the Karens