this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
1265 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5872 readers
2880 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

I mean, you could totally make Home Alone II today as long as you set it pre-9/11, so I take this to mean "these movies that were set in the 'present day' could not be redone and set in the 'present day' of 2024."

You couldn't make Back to the Future because 21st century streets are no place for minors on skateboards.

You couldn't make American Beauty for a LOT of reasons (including prevalence of digital video, marijuana legalization, increased public awareness/concern about pedophilia, etc)

You couldn't make Clueless because shopping malls are dead (or at least nowhere near as cool as they used to be)

You couldn't make Trainspotting or Requiem for a Dream because heroin and cocaine are quaint drugs by 2020s standards

You couldn't make Paris is Burning because Harlem gentrified big time (I know this is a documentary but still)

You couldn't make The Matrix because no one would believe human batteries would be happy and content living in a simulation of 2024 (also no telephone booths)

I almost said The Truman Show because we basically live in that world already but fuck it, I wanna see a 2024 version where the producers have to keep desperately introducing crazier plot developments to try and compete for a TikTok-addicted audience unamused by "just another reality TV show", and constant set issues like cast members getting fired right and left for sneaking smartphones onto set.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I mean, you could totally make Home Alone II today as long as you set it pre-9/11

Yeah, it's like saying "you couldn't make Saving Private Ryan, because Europe is no longer at war".

[–] KmlSlmk64@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I think you're absolutely correct, but I think the difference between "Home alone today" vs "Save private Ryan today" is, that when thinking about home alone, because the story is essentially time/context agnostic, they might imagine in being today, but in the save private Ryan it is specifically refering to 2nd world war, so noone would think about it being placed in today's world But yeah, I agree with you. I could totally imagine a big movie creator lobbying government(s) to hamper war-ending efforts, so they can film there authentically, if it was easier than to do it in a studio

[–] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Europe is currently at war.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Saving Private Ivan

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

You could set it in Ukraine.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You couldn’t make The Matrix because no one would believe human batteries would be happy and content living in a simulation of 2024 (also no telephone booths)

Rewatch the movie. Smith says, slightly paraphrasing, "We tried to make the Matrix a paradise, where none would suffer, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. Many wouldn't accept the programming, entire crops were lost."

So they simulated life as it was, complete with shitty apartments and asshole bosses.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

He also talks about how they chose 1999 very intentionally for the simulation, as it was the peak of human civilization before the era of the machine. But nowadays instead feels like we're already entering the era of the machine: we spend most of our time on devices and are surrounded by surveillance and now AI is entering the mix. Plus the 2020s also has featured a variety of other dystopian features like pandemic, inflation, extreme inequity, growing monopolies, the rise of fascism, and a very real chance of WWIII from multiple directions among them.

You have to remember 1999 was in fact an exceptionally peaceful and optimistic time in western society (at least in the US, which is where the film focuses on), but the year still had its "everyday woes," making it the setting with a perfect balance between an ideal life and a crappy one. 2024 is way too far in the crappy direction.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but 2024 sucks way too much for the premise that it's as good as the human brain will accept.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You couldn't make Back to the Future because 21st century streets are no place for minors on skateboards.

Delete this misinformation.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I wish we lived in a world where I could

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago

Trainspotting with Meth would be... A train wreck...

I kinda want to see this now

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You couldn’t make Clueless because shopping malls are dead (or at least nowhere near as cool as they used to be)

Not in smaller towns, but big malls in bigger cities are still thriving.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As an European, it boggles my mind that small town malls were ever a big thing in the US.

In my country, cities still have malls, but small towns never did. There's just not enough people + anyone who wants to go shopping will just go to the nearest city.

Then again, I guess our cities are American small towns by population...

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Small town America didn't have a "third space". That's essentially what made malls successful.

European small towns still have a walkable city center of some kind with restaurants and shops. Shopping malls are America's version of the European city center.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

True, but it's less of a universal experience than in the 90s, and thus would be significantly less relatable to a growing population of teens, many of whom have few or no accessible third spaces left. My understanding is it's mostly upscale malls and shops that are still thriving; most other standard mall retail has moved online.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

(also no telephone booths)

Speaking of telephone booths: With their disappearance the 2001 movie "Phone Booth" also lost its location.