218

Really you don't need to read more than one chart:

If you vote for anyone other than Harris, you're voting for Trump:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

I don’t think anyone suggested both parties are the same.

[-] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

If they aren’t the same in their view, they they would be sensible to care about which wins. They have a stake in a less harmful result.

But literally throwing away their vote on a third party, they are inflicting harm on themselves, the electorate, and the world.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

Who are you talking about?

Third party votes get counted and have an effect. The whole idea of throwing one’s vote away is so nonsensical that it was lampooned in a simpsons bit.

If third party voters are inflicting harm on all the groups you mentioned, does that mean they’re responsible for the harm caused by one or the other party? Would you extend that to people who actively voted for those two parties? To the people enacting those parties policies? Deciding them?

Just how responsible for Bidens genocide in Gaza would you say a person who voted third party or trump in 2020 can be held?

[-] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Did you even READ the original linked article?

Seems like not.

Voting third party is the same as voting for Trump. THAT'S the effect that third party votes have. You're deluding yourself if you think they have any other effect in this upcoming election.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Wait how is a third party vote the same as a trump vote, they’re for different candidates?

Third party votes don’t get counted towards trumps total and the president isn’t elected by popular vote anyway.

[-] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Did you READ the original article??

Are you being intentionally dense?

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago

I did read the article.

It doesn’t make a convincing case that a third party vote is the same as a trump vote. That’s why I asked you to explain how you came to that conclusion.

The article also claims third parties can’t possibly expect to get any electoral votes but then says if they did then it could create a situation where the house chooses the president.

If dems want third party voters to support them and are in danger of losing for want of third party voters, dems can simply pick up platforms and policies that third party voters want.

[-] Mpeach45@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I’m at the point where I’m convinced you’re being willfully dense.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Before you asked about the article, I asked how third party votes are the same as trump votes. I explained that the votes aren’t counted for trump so they can’t be the same and that they are counted so they’re not thrown away.

Instead of asking incredulously if I’d read the posted article, why not just engage with what I’m saying?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago
[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

lol. Two party-ailures btfo

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
218 points (87.3% liked)

politics

31132 readers
3594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS