this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
857 points (91.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

2869 readers
693 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think you missed the point. If you build all of those things you mentioned in a similar compact fashion you still have lots of room for nature and more efficiency when compared to sprawl.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're missing my point. Development density doesn't preserve green space. It just puts more people in a smaller space. Protecting green spaces requires actual protections.

This graphic implies that there is a market solution to protecting green spaces. It's suggesting that NIMBYs who oppose high-density zoning are the reason for suburban wastelands. Zoning regulation should prioritize preserving green spaces and public lands, but deregulation is not the fix (as is implied).

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you actually. As usual, text conversations don't really convey the entirety of the thought/concept, and lead to misunderstandings.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Anytime a complicated subject is condensed to such simplicity as in the original image, all the nuance of the topic is left out. It's a problem with all true political topics.

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

You can sell the wood and drill for oil, maybe there is some gas or coal to burn.