this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
-71 points (8.2% liked)

Conservative

363 readers
14 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a list of primary sources of democrats calling for someone to assassinate trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jwelch55@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm curious if they can provide even a single example of what they mean by this

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Did you not click? He provided plenty of direct examples.

[–] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you have an example from an unbiased source?

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It links directly to their twitters and videos of them saying these things. Regardless of bias of the one collecting them, the actual sources are unbiased, or even biased in the other direction

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee -2 points 3 weeks ago

When people scream bias, it’s normally because they didn’t read the document or can’t refute it. As you said these all link back the original source.

[–] jwelch55@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I see words, but they don't match the claim

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com -4 points 3 weeks ago

What do you mean?