this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1220 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

5832 readers
1560 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Isn't Starlink also too expensive because you have to replace the satellites every 5 years? As in you'd have to sell to basically everybody on earth to be profitable. And they charge 50Euros a month, almost twice as much as I currently pay, and I'm satisfied with my current provider.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Their target market is people who don't have a better option, not people who already have fibre to the door.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And those people are famously wealthy.

[–] brlemworld@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, RV travelers, cruise lines, multiple militaries.

[–] dubious@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

not exactly my friend.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Its their data thats worth money. Now its collectable.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Starlink is expensive, but it's not that expensive.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And they're running at a loss.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

it is looking like that flipped this year to over 200 million in profit off over 2 billion in revenue

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I just checked Wikipedia, and there it also says small profit. Could be caused by how the satellites are being written off, though.

[–] dubious@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

not exactly. many starlink users are not your grandpa in his $500k RV. it's the digital nomad in their $5k RV held together by duct tape. some of us would do anything to get away from all the bullshit of modern society, and quite frankly i think the world needs more of us.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

I was being sarcastic. I simply don't believe that there's enough money to be made selling satellite internet to support replacing a large constellation of satellites every 5 years. Especially since Starlink's competitors use higher up satellites, meaning they don't have to replace their satellites as often.

[–] asterfield@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

50Euros a month, almost twice as much as I current pay

Wow Canada sucks in our ISP choices

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 months ago

Cries in long island

I have one option that isn't 4g wireless crap... It's $110/month for 500mbps... It was $80/month but they felt the need to make more money by eliminating their lower tiers and "forcing" you to upgrade... I just suddenly had a 500mbps plan and $110 bill without asking them to change anything...

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

I'm sure they ran the numbers and saw a goldmine in the future, except goldmines pale in comparison. They can serve a global market and can grow basically to serve the entire world. Their internal launch costs will continue to get lower and satellites can be improved to last longer.