this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
1537 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

5507 readers
1890 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think about the natural conclusion to the problem that you're trying to address. What if we pay teenagers who don't need the money less than everyone else. That would incentivize employers to ... check notes ... only hire teenagers who don't need the money. Everyone else, who actually does need the money, they would have trouble finding a job. Facepalm.

Also. Because your teenagers are getting lucky, in that they have a family that's paying all of their bills, you somehow wish that they weren't getting lucky, and that some rich person was getting richer? Do I understand that correctly?

Furthermore. There might be value to your teens in working less so that they can do other things when they're still teenagers. That might be something you would want to explore, since your family's finances are in a solid state.

And hey, if you think your teenager is being overpaid, why don't you encourage them to donate some of their money to charity?

In many other families, finances aren't so strong. Maybe the parents can pay the bills, but if the kids want to go to college, they'll have to take out student loans. Or they could start saving in high school, and use that money for college, or to get an apartment if they have to move out, or to buy a car, or whatever else they need after they graduate high school. All of a sudden the extra money sounds really important, doesn't it.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No, I’m saying that while I agree that essentially every job should have a livable wage, I can’t. Reconcile that with a teenager’s part time job while living at home.

I’d entertain the idea of an exception to livable wages, even if it hurts my family. However I don’t see a reasonable way to apply that without affecting everyone