this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
1050 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19158 readers
2748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This is the only issue worth campaigning on. Fuck everyone for not realizing it. We will never get this system under control if it continues to misrepresent what the majority wants. There is no amount of bargaining and compromise that will ever bring forth the change we need to stop global climate change. Ranked choice - for its simplicity. Star - for its utility. Etc. Etc. Make the debate strictly about how we will reform voting and push everything else to the end of the list.

BTW, I'm not asking politicians to do this. I'm ask you, the people, if you will make your voice heard and enshrine it with a government that truly represents you.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

This is the only issue worth campaigning on.

You're not going to like the people campaigning on it, though.

Spoilers: It's the Spoiler Candidates

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Every candidate should be campaigning on it. Not until the Republicans are brazenly defending the broken system, or alternatively join the move for reformation because they think they can capitalize on it, is the country moving in the right direction.

When the pollsters call you your answer to every question should be, "I don't care we need vote reform."

When the media focus groups you,"I don't care we need vote reform."

When the NAZIs try to bait you, "I don't care we need vote reform."

I know, this isn't a fully fleshed out strategy but it is a stance that will elevate the discussion.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You’re not going to like the people campaigning on it, though.

Spoilers: It’s the Spoiler Candidates

...because the Dems and GOP benefit from the current system. Any move away from FPTP harms them, so they aren't going to support it and any other party is a "spoiler candidate" because of how FPTP works.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Any move away from FPTP harms them, so they aren’t going to support it

Sure. But if you don't vote for the Democrats then you are implicitly supporting fascism and that will mean an end to all forms of democracy (or so I've been told).

[–] qed123@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I respectfully disagree. Any attempt to frame both parties as the same is a big fat down vote from me. You sound insightful and intelligent though.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As far as wanting to maintain the current electoral system, both parties are the same and they are the same in this one particular thing because they both benefit from it and any move away from it upsets the status quo that keeps the money and power flowing to them.

The only move either party wants to make away from the current electoral system is if they could find a way to reduce it to a single party system and that party was theirs.

They aren't the same in virtually any other way, to the point of being as extremely and overly opposed on as many other things as possible, in part because presenting everything as a dichotomy of extremes reinforces that system.

[–] qed123@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Hey I appreciate your thoughtful and insightful response. While I am hesitant to agree entirely, especially in an empirical sense, I think much of your statement is probably very accurate and I certainly am not able to confidently state anything to the contrary, on the fly, at this time. I will keep your ideas in mind and I do thank you for some ideas to chomp on.

I kinda want to resist your confident statements regarding the similarities, but honestly I can't refute what you stated off the top of my head. And upur rebuttal of the "both sides a0re same" schtick is much appreciated, and well stated.

I honestly am surprised by your considerate and thoughtful response. I do a lot of snarkey and thoughtless responses to what I feel are insincere or flimsy ideas presented everywhere, and rarely do I get a response as kind and thorough, solid as yours.

Keep up the food work 8)

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tough luck, if you want to ask the people and want to have a say in national discourse, you have to buy a media outlet like billionaires do.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Keep carrying water for them.