this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
538 points (95.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29819 readers
709 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why does it take God our entire lives to decide whether we are accepted? What about babies that die during birth or shortly after? How can they prove their faith?

Simple. Mercy. If we screwed up, then God would destroy us immediately. If God were to just stop evil happening on Earth, he'd have to kill everyone at the first moment that they sin. Either that or take away free will.

I would say that the resurrection was just part of the religious texts written by monks, not necessarily something that was 100% true.

Biblical scholars would disagree. The earliest text that we have that mentions the resurrection was written by AD 51.

1 Thessalonians 1:9-10

For the people of those regions report about us what kind of welcome we had among you, and how you turned to God from idols, to serve a living and true God, and to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead—Jesus, who rescues us from the wrath that is coming.

Again, it's worth mentioning that immediate writings were VERY RARE then. The entire Gospel of Mark would have cost the same as a house for a scribe to copy. Which is why we don't have many writings from that time.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, but Biblical scholars' proof of the resurrection is from the Bible? You see how that's not convincing right?

God created sin and hell, it didn't need to do that. After three decades as a Christian, the best answer I could get to the question "Why did God make the universe and us in it?" was "so we could praise it for eternity in heaven." So it could have just created us in heaven already. Instead it created a whole universe of randomness and ever-increasing chaos, stuck us in it and said, "You better love me and follow these very specific, often inane and arbitrary rules, or I'll send you to this other place I made where all you feel is pain for eternity." The god of the Bible is an egomaniacal sadist and it's not worthy of your praise.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's like saying our proof for Caesar is Caesar's writing. Now if I said Caesar's writings were true because he said so, that would be circular reasoning. But no, they are backed up by history. In the same way, the Bible can prove Christianity, but circular reasoning is when I try and use the Bible to prove itself because it says it's true. Although proof can lie within such as criteria of embarrassment, but mainly it's to how it relates to what else we know about that time, which is how it lines up. Unlike, for example, the book of mormon which is completely verifiably fake as it talks about systems in an ancient america which we know didn't exist

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm taking that as tacit agreement that your god is an egomaniacal sadist but you don't mind cuz it's old, just fyi

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He created children and child rape, how is he not?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's wrong with Children? And didn't we create that atrocity though by choosing to do that? He created sex to be between a consenting man and woman within marriage, not for using to abuse people.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, by Christian understanding, god made the universe and everything in it. That includes the human capacity for causing pain to others. God also decided our sexual characteristics should fully develop a decade before our mental and emotional capacity, not how I would have done it. It also includes childhood leukemia, SIDS, hydrocephalopathy, measles, polio, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, multiple sclerosis, etc, etc, etc. If god wasn't a sadist, none of those things would exist. Either that or god didn't create them because it doesn't exist. These are the options available to you.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those things happened because God cursed the earth after we turned against Him.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But by your own holy texts, it knew we would do that before the universe existed, much less the Garden of Eden. If it didn't, then it's not all-knowing, which means it's not God. Either way, it's not worthy of devotion or worship.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if you want to live your life without God, God respects your decision eternally 👍

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

If you call lakes of fire, wailing and gnashing of teeth, and eternal damnation to complete separation from The Light "respect," then I totally get why you worship the dude. I guess he really did create you in his sadistic image. 😘