this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
16 points (94.4% liked)

Melbourne

1870 readers
53 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that affect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] RustyRaven@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd still probably go with re-homed for that. Rescue to me definitely implies doing a bit more.

I know someone who drove to a dodgy area to collect a dog which was being starved in a backyard because it's owner was in prison, and I'd definitely say by doing that she rescued the dog. Other times the pet may have been rescued, like a chicken that was retrieved from a tree in Chinatown by the fire brigade. In which case it is reasonable to refer to them as a rescue chicken, but that doesn't mean the person who then gives them a home should get credit for the rescue, they have still just re-housed a rescued animal.

[โ€“] melbaboutown@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, rescue implies some pretty exceptional circumstances

[โ€“] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago

maybe it's middle class people rescuing a pet from a working class area /family/existence s/