this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
167 points (100.0% liked)

Emulation

3569 readers
1 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The software is perfectly legal.

[–] Confetti_Camouflage@pawb.social 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Assuming USA:

The software can absolutely be declared illegal under DMCA and has already been done to the DVD decrytion software DeCSS. Nintendo would just have to convince the courts that the primary purpose of the software is to circumvent their DRM, and I doubt any lawyer would want to defend that when circumventing copy protection is absolutely happening.

Relevant DMCA passage:

Section 1201(a)(2) of the Copyright Act, part of the DMCA, provides that:

"No person shall . . . offer to the public, provide or otherwise traffic in any technology . . . that---

"(A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under [the Copyright Act];

"(B) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under [the Copyright Act]; or

"(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that person's knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under [the Copyright Act]."

The injunction that was granted: https://cryptome.org/dvd-mpaa-3-pi.htm

Court's findings and arguments for granting the injunction: https://cyber.harvard.edu/openlaw/DVD/filings/NY/0202-mem-order.html

See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

Fair. Thank you for this write up. I love (/s) our pay to win legal system!

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nintendo's legal argument is that the encryption that is reverse-engineered to circumvent copy-protection is protected intellectual property.

Anyone can copy the contents of a switch ROM (more of a glorified SD card anyway) but the million-dollar question is whether their proprietary encryption can be broken legally.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't the encryption algorithm open? That's what matters. It's AES, no?

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... and if so, a key/password is not legally protected. Have Lexmark's bullshit to thank for that precedent.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago

You don't necesairally need to to dump a switch to emulate something with Yuzu. Look at all of the GBA games made today. Wii homebrew, etc.