this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
805 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

5263 readers
1229 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm confused how three 10s gives 100. Did she mean 1000?

Edit: In case it's somehow not clear, I'm fully aware I am willfully overanalyzing the ramblings of the deranged.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She just repeated herself. 10 fake names at 10 places is 100.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why mention 10 polling booths then lmao

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the 10 fake names and vote 10 times that's the repetition.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but each name can only vote once yet she says it's 100 votes. I don't think it's a fair assumption that she meant to use one booth at each location.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

10 fake names/votes at 10 different polling places equals 100 votes. That's what she's saying. I don't see what you're not getting.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was stupid of her to say the number 10 three times and end up with 100. 10×10×10 is 1000. One of them is redundant. Logically it should be 10 votes or 1000 votes or it's redundant confusing information.