Firefox

17815 readers

43 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

-10

People should stop mentioning Firefox Google deal when they defend Firefox against their advertising investments. (programming.dev)

submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by 911@programming.dev to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If Google stopped supporting Firefox today, Bing would still pay to be the default engine. If bing does not pay, Yandex would do.

My point here is Firefox still has 2.71% market share, a lot of search engines operators would pay Firefox good money to be their default engine.

The default search revenue stream is guaranteed as long as they have good amount of users.

But they actively choose to ruin it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But Brave isn't maintaining a rendering engine, so they're able to spend on different things.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How much do you think Tailcat cost Brave? I know Mozilla must spend more money doing legitimate browser development, but they also spend a whole lot of money doing entirely unrelated things.

If it was less than $65 million, the amount of money Mozilla committed to AI and VC back in 2022, it could have been the money they purchased Tailcat with back in 2021.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are you bringing up AI? Brave, like all major browsers, has also invested in AI https://brave.com/leo/

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

You said Mozilla couldn't purchase a search engine by implying they didn't have enough free money, so I gave you an example of them spending $65 million. I just thought to myself, "isn't it interesting that they missed an opportunity to directly monetize something," and I shared it with you.