this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
1538 points (95.2% liked)

Political Memes

5507 readers
1891 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not the same person, but I carry similar sentiments. I helped form the second largest tech union in North America. What are you doing to support the working working class and build alternatives to capital? Tossing support at the nearest person in fear doesn't prevent fascism.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To use your example, here are the options:

  • today we can definitely get a Union that covers some tech workers but not all of them.

Or

  • today we can try to get a Union for all tech workers, but it’s a long shot. And if we lose, the consequences are that we don’t get another union vote for 4 years and during that time, the tech companies get to run rampant with negative propaganda about unions, making the challenge even harder next time.

Which would you choose, second largest tech union guy?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

False dichotomy. The stakes of the second version are the same for the first regardless of union size. There never has been and never will be a guaranteed union campaign until we overthrow capitalism.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Voting against the fascist candidate abso-fucking-lutely prevents fascism. This is an extremely simple concept that one would imagine the founder of the second-largest tech union in North America should be able to wrap their mind around.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think my point has been missed. The fact that there's an openly fascist candidate running for president means that fascism is already here and in power.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not in power. But you're helping them get back in power. If people like you decided to get behind the non-fascist, it would be a non-issue, hence the post.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can name some of them. You probably recognize them.

  • Mike Johnson
  • Marjorie Greene
  • Mitch McConnell
  • Jacob Frey
  • Leonard Leo

Nowhere did I say I wasn't voting. Voting is the least effective method of change that exists, but it's still a method. I will still be participating because it can lead to minor changes. If you think that defeating fascism can be done by voting once every 4 years however, you will be played.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm glad that you participate. Voting is the easiest and most direct method of change.

And yeah, it can be defeated by voting (every 2 years, for primaries too) if you have enough people to join. It's unfortunate that there are enough cynics who don't participate who could make real change if they did.

Every time Trump's judges make another radical ruling, I'm reminded that people stayed home. And now pregnant women aren't safe in red states, just as one example.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

it can be defeated by voting

It never has been. Even in France with the left coalition, Macron has been courting the fascist right.