I don't like the clickbait title at all -- Mastodon's clearly going to survive, at least for the forseeable future, and it wouldn't surprise me if it outlives Xitter.

Still, Mastodon is struggling; most of the people who checkd it out in the November 2022 surge (or the smaller June 2023 surge) didn't stick around, and numbers have been steadily declining for the last year. The author makes some good points, and some of the comments are excellent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Both Intsagram and Twitter will fill your feed with random people / brands you don't follow.

It's all about the dopamine hit.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Not with squawker for Twitter. Displays only people you follow and in chronological order. There's no recommendations or ads.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

When you say "people...", assume that most use the native app.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Regular people likely care more about being able to follow who they follow than ads, which they are more likely to put up with even for basic browsing. Last bit was just how I use it.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just saying, that they are really, really inefficient as RSS for everyday people since the are more posts you didn't subscribe to, than the ones you subscribed to.

Hence saying that it's what people use them for IMO , genedally, is incorrect.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I'm saying they are using it like a rss in the fact that they are mainly there just to follow and be fed content. It's where they go if they want direct content submissions from blank famous person.

You seem more fixated on arguing semantics.