this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
131 points (90.7% liked)

Futurology

1731 readers
128 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does a study have to be empirical? I'm not aware of any rule.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When you see study, it's more statistical analysis of things.

So things like clinical studies doing studies on population of people.

Where this is more publication of a mathematical idea.

Source: have a degree in physics and it's one of those unwritten rules. Kinda like how English sentences have an order. The soft brown big bunny sounds wired.

[–] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've also got a degree in physics and I think it's a valid if kinda wonky use of the word study. They studied whether or not GR allowed this specific thing and that's enough to say it's physically possible. It's not just publishing an idea so much as proving the validity of it within current models, to me a study implies investigation of some kind and that's definitely what went on here.

I've definitely heard it used this way before, even if it is less common. I wouldn't say it's an unwritten rule so much just that people have learnt to infer that there's some direct observation going on.

Agreed that it's valid if wonky.

It's why I compared it to the sentence structure. It just rings a little weird in my ear and that's why.