this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
912 points (79.2% liked)

Political Memes

5341 readers
3656 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world -3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that does seem pretty likely. I also think civil war would become very likely after a stunt like that. Great movie idea actually. The ethnofascists decide that Trump being assassinated could actually galvanize a full white supremacy uprising. So they do it. Vance predictably circles the wagons and declares martial law. The confedernazis start lynching. And then all hell breaks loose.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Life is not a fucking movie or video game. A lot of people would die. It would not be "like, totally awesome dude".

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 20 hours ago

Ignore the edgelord. That's what I should have done.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world -4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Didn't say it would be awesome. It would really suck. Lots of people dead. Yep. But given the current status quo, lots of people are already dead. So is it the rate of death that bothers you?

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes! What kind of stupid question is that?? Making things worse is bad.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It is a question that matters. Why is the current rate of death not already "worse"? We currently seem unable to halt it. It is already unbearable and horrible. And it won't stop after the election regardless of who wins. That sad truth is that those in power, those with money, simply don't care about it. It is already "worse." The president has less control over foreign aid than you believe.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Why is the current rate of death not already “worse”?

....math?? 3 dead people is worse than 2 dead people, again I ask what kind of stupid question is that?