this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
188 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

59549 readers
3350 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“Passkeys,” the secure authentication mechanism built to replace passwords, are getting more portable and easier for organizations to implement thanks to new initiatives the FIDO Alliance announced on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Actually, it is still a problem, because passwords are a shared secret between you and the server, which means the server has that secret in some sort of form. With passkeys, the server never has the secret.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The shared secret with my Vaultwarden server? Add mfa and someone needs to explain to me how passkeys do anything more than saving one single solitary click.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When a website gets hacked they only find public keys, which are useless without the private keys.

Private keys stored on a password manager are still more secure, as those services are (hopefully!) designed with security in mind from the beginning.

If a website with old-school passwords gets hacked, the hacker only gets salted hashes of passwords - this does not seem to be much worse?

(Websites that store plaintext passwords surely won't implement passkeys either...)

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Pass keys are for websites such as Google, Facebook, TikTok, etc. And then they go into what is currently your password manager or if you don't have one, it goes into your device. You still have to prove to that password manager that you are, who you say you are, either by a master password of some sort or biometrics.

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Best password manager is offline password manager.

KeepassXC makes a file with the passwords that is encrypted, sharing this file with a server is more secure than letting the server manage your passwords

[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

This is not at all relevant to the comment you're responding to. Your choice of password manager doesn't change that whatever system you're authenticating against still needs to have at least a hash of your password. That's what passkeys are improving on here

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree, and that's my method as well. Although I do not ever share the file with a server either. I only transfer it from device to device with flash drives or syncthing.

[–] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you handle merging between devices? Do you manually transfer/sync every time you add a new password?

Not trying to sell you on putting it in cloud storage or anything, but one really nice benefit to doing so is automatic merging through clients like Keepass2Android. If I add a new site to my phone and it doesn't already have the latest copy of my vault, it'll fetch and merge that first.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Technically yes I don't have to use a desktop or laptop very often and do most of my computing from my mobile phone running lineage OS obviously and so what I do is if I add a password once every quarter at least I back it up to a flash drive so that if nothing else I will only lose a few months worth of data. I also don't go signing up for accounts and services all that often since I am particularly interested in keeping my privacy. So very few modifications occur with my passwords in three months. If I absolutely must get a new password onto my laptop immediately, then I will go ahead and plug in my flash drive and manually synchronize whenever that is required as well.

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do that too, I have my own server in my basement for storage

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Look at us. A bunch of people who don't trust society. LOL.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can share passwords without the server seeing them. Many managers don't but there's nothing infeasible there. You just have a password to unlock the manager. Done.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What I'm getting at is that a web server has a password, in some form. And so if that site gets breached, your password itself may not get leaked, but the hash will. And if the hash is a common hash, then it can be easily cracked or guessed.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ultimately I'm pro passkey but when it comes to password managers: if the hash of your vault is easy to crack you've fucked up big time. There shouldn't be any way to crack that key with current tech before the sun explodes because you should be using a high entropy passphrase.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Oh, you absolutely should. And if you are not, that is nobody's fault except your own.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Not anything sufficiently modern. Salted passwords should be exceedingly difficult to reverse.