Technology

59594 readers

3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

719

In light of articles all over Lemmy about Google pushing ManifestV3 onto Chrome and the majority of web users, isn't that an antitrust violation? (www.ftc.gov)

submitted 1 year ago by SankaraStone@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So as I understand it, Google’s using it’s monopoly market position to force web “standards” unilaterally (without an independent/conglomerate web specification standards where Google is only one of many voices) that will disadvantage its competitors and force people to leave its competitors.

I'm not a lawyer, and I'm a fledgling tech guy, but this sounds like abuse of a monopoly. Google which serves 75% of the world's ads and has 75% of the browser market share seems to want to use its market power to annihilate people's privacy and control over their web experience.

So we can file a complaint with FTC led by Lina Khan who has been the biggest warrior against abuse by big tech in the US.

https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/report-antitrust-violation

We can also file a complaint with the DOJ:

https://www.justice.gov/atr/citizen-complaint-center

And there have to be EU, UK, Indian, Chinese, and Japanese organizations that we can file antitrust complaints to.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only an anti-trust violation if an anti-trust case is made and a sentence passed. A new Chrome update and a couple Benjamins on the adequate courts should easily fix that,.

[–] diemechanist@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, judges are humans too and susceptible to corruption.

[–] HR_Pufnstuf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Susceptible? It's their default position.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

🤔 So what do we do? I am de-googlefying as we speak, but collectively, we really need to organize and build workarounds.

[–] BloodForTheBloodGod@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Don't trust the state to solve your problems. Organize and be ready to act