I used a linux os for my phone for a while called SailfishOS and it was great having fully fledged apps for things like maps, music, etc in the kB range. The app i used for public transport schedules was 15kB.

[–] Arkhive@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’d love to learn more about this. With hyprland I could see a passable “mobile” UI that feels like an extension of my main system, but I’ve not taken the dive into trying to get Linux working on a phone making calls and everything.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have a Fairphone and i really wanna try out ubuntu touch on there some time. The functionality support with that is pretty amazing now, basically all relevant features are supported. The only issues are VoLTE not working and GPS being slow, but thats because of missing google services so cant be helped.

This also comes with waydroid btw, an android emulator thats pretty fast for all normal applications.

Fairphone 4 feature support: https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/device/fp4/

Device list for ubuntu touch: https://devices.ubuntu-touch.io/promoted/

[–] palitu@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am very conscious of how much data I use due to where I now live. I have noticed that flatpak's have a massive download size (100's of megs), especially when compared to the deb package (kb to mb) 2-3 orders of magnitude more.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Anyone correct me if im wrong but afaik, .deb packages just install the actual program and can utilize your systems existing packages as dependencies, while flatpaks are completely isolated and need to bring loads of dependencies with them. This whole trend towards isolated software packages is nice for security and compatibility, but yeah size and performance are comparably dogshit.